Britain’s PM Won’t Rule Out the Question That Divides His Party

UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham declined to rule out including a pledge to rejoin the European Union in Labour’s next election manifesto. He made the remark to reporters on September 22, while traveling to the United Nations General Assembly. It has reopened the UK rejoin EU debate at a moment when Burnham’s government is trying to project stability heading into this year’s Labour Party conference.

Reporters asked directly whether he could exclude an EU-rejoin commitment from the party’s platform. Burnham said the question was “for another day,” according to Euronews. He steered the conversation instead toward his government’s efforts to rebuild ties with Brussels through diplomatic channels already underway.

What Burnham actually said to reopen the UK rejoin EU debate

Burnham told reporters his “immediate priority” was to “build on the good work that Keir did in rebuilding bridges” with the EU. He wants to reach a “practical agreement that will further boost the British economy,” a reference to his predecessor’s efforts to repair post-Brexit relations. He stopped well short of endorsing a formal rejoin campaign. But his refusal to rule it out was enough to restart a debate many in his own party had hoped to leave behind.

The comments were notable given Burnham’s own history on the issue. He has previously spoken in favor of the UK rejoining the EU. He moderated that position during his leadership campaign earlier in 2026, telling supporters at the time that “the last thing we should do right now is rerun those arguments.”

European Union flags outside Brussels amid the UK rejoin EU debate

Why this is politically dangerous for Labour

Opposition leaders moved quickly to frame Burnham’s comments as a return to Brexit-era hostilities. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch warned that Labour risked “restarting the Brexit wars.” Reform UK’s Richard Tice went further, calling a potential rejoin debate “a new Battle of Britain.”

Within Labour itself, senior figures have not been unanimous on how forcefully to raise the subject. Defence Secretary Wes Streeting has previously called Brexit “catastrophic,” reflecting a wing of the party more comfortable revisiting the question. Others have urged caution after Labour’s disappointing results in local elections in May 2026. Some in the party blamed those results partly on unresolved arguments over Britain’s relationship with Europe.

The Labour conference backdrop

CNN’s coverage of Labour’s party conference this week described Burnham as riding high politically, even as “tough choices” loom on multiple fronts. The EU question adds another difficult decision to that list. Raising it energizes a segment of Labour’s base that never accepted Brexit. But it also risks alienating voters in areas where opposition to EU membership remains strong.

What Burnham does next

Burnham has signaled that any substantive move on EU membership would follow, not precede, the outcome of ongoing UK-EU summit talks aimed at practical economic cooperation. That sequencing gives him room to defer a firm answer on the manifesto question for now. But the issue is unlikely to disappear before Labour finalizes its platform ahead of the next general election.

What it would take to actually rejoin

Even if Labour did commit to a rejoin pledge, the path back into the EU would be long. It would involve a fresh accession process, renewed negotiations over the terms of membership, and almost certainly another public vote, given how the original Brexit referendum was decided. None of that groundwork has begun. That is part of why Burnham’s critics argue raising the question now is premature at best. Even sympathetic voices within Labour have acknowledged that a rejoin campaign would consume years of political capital and diplomatic effort. The government is already juggling economic pressures and a demanding legislative agenda closer to home.

What the EU rejoin debate means — answered

Did Andy Burnham commit to rejoining the EU?

No. He declined to rule out a rejoin pledge in Labour’s next manifesto. But he stopped short of endorsing the idea, saying the question was “for another day.”

When did Burnham make these comments?

He spoke to reporters on September 22, 2026, while traveling to the United Nations General Assembly.

What has Burnham said about the EU in the past?

He previously supported the UK rejoining the EU. He moderated that stance during his 2026 leadership campaign, saying at the time that rerunning Brexit arguments was “the last thing we should do.”

How have opposition parties reacted?

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch warned of “restarting the Brexit wars,” and Reform UK’s Richard Tice called a potential debate “a new Battle of Britain.”

Is Labour united on this issue?

No. Some senior figures, including Defence Secretary Wes Streeting, have previously called Brexit “catastrophic.” Others have urged caution after Labour’s setbacks in May 2026 local elections.

What would it actually take for the UK to rejoin the EU?

It would require a full accession process, fresh negotiations over membership terms, and very likely another public referendum, none of which has begun.

More on UK and EU relations

Where this reporting comes from

  • Euronews — British prime minister Burnham declines to rule out rejoining EU. euronews.com
  • CNN — Andy Burnham is on a high. When will he fall to earth? cnn.com

Norway’s Prime Minister Has to Explain Himself to Parliament This Week

Norway’s parliament, the Storting, opens public hearings today into ties between Norwegian officials and the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store is among those set to testify. The Norway Epstein parliamentary hearings mark the most visible stage yet of an inquiry that began earlier this year. It followed newly released documents connected to the Epstein case that put Norwegian diplomats and politicians under scrutiny.

The Standing Committee on Scrutiny and Constitutional Affairs is running the inquiry. It is examining both the personal conduct of individual officials and how Norwegian state institutions responded once concerns about Epstein’s conduct became known.

Who testifies at the Norway Epstein parliamentary hearings

Committee adviser Kristian Haugeland confirmed a schedule for three witnesses on September 30. They are Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store, former Foreign Minister Borge Brende, who held the post from 2013 to 2017, and former Foreign Minister Ine Eriksen Soreide. The committee scheduled a second round of testimony for October 1. Current Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide and former Foreign Minister Anniken Huitfeldt will appear that day.

That lineup spans more than a decade of Norwegian diplomacy. Norway’s current and several recent foreign ministers will all face questions from the same committee within a two-day span.

Witness testimony setting during the Norway Epstein parliamentary hearings

How the inquiry got here

The Storting voted earlier in 2026 to establish the commission. Al Jazeera described the trigger as a “political storm” set off by Epstein-related documents naming Norwegian diplomats and their associates. Norwegian authorities separately opened a probe into a diplomat and the diplomat’s husband over alleged Epstein links, according to earlier reporting on the case.

The hearings beginning this week mark a first. The prime minister and multiple former foreign ministers will answer questions on the record in the same forum, rather than through separate written statements or isolated media interviews.

What the committee is trying to establish

The inquiry goes beyond the conduct of any individual official. It is examining whether Norwegian state institutions acted appropriately once information about Epstein’s activities became available to them. That institutional question, rather than any single allegation against a named person, is what gives the hearings their broader political weight in Norway.

What happens after this week’s testimony

The committee has not announced when it expects to conclude its work or publish findings. Parliamentary inquiries of this kind in Norway typically continue gathering testimony and documentary evidence before issuing a public report. That process can extend well beyond the initial round of hearings. Norwegian media plan to cover each day of testimony closely, given the seniority of the officials involved.

Why this inquiry is being watched beyond Norway

Epstein-related parliamentary and government inquiries have surfaced in multiple countries in recent years. Norway’s hearings add to that pattern with a notably senior set of witnesses. A sitting prime minister testifying before a parliamentary committee on this subject is uncommon. The outcome could influence how other governments handle similar questions about official conduct connected to the Epstein case.

Norway is not alone in facing renewed scrutiny over Epstein-related connections. Legislatures and government bodies in several countries have opened their own reviews in recent years, as previously sealed documents and court records tied to the case have become public. What sets Norway’s inquiry apart is the seniority of those called to testify in a single, compressed window. A sitting prime minister and four current or former foreign ministers are all appearing before the same committee within two days.

How the hearings are expected to unfold

Committee hearings of this type in Norway are typically open to the public and broadcast. That gives Norwegian voters direct access to the testimony, rather than relying solely on official summaries or media reports. Committee members are expected to question each witness on two things: their personal knowledge of any contacts with Epstein or his associates, and decisions made within their ministries at the time. The witnesses span more than a decade of Norwegian foreign policy leadership. Their answers may reveal how much information about Epstein’s conduct was shared, or not shared, across successive governments.

Answers to key questions on the Epstein hearings

What are the Norway Epstein parliamentary hearings about?

A Storting committee is holding hearings on ties between Norwegian officials and diplomats and the late Jeffrey Epstein. It is also examining how Norwegian state institutions responded once concerns about his conduct emerged.

Is Norway’s prime minister actually testifying?

Yes. Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store will testify on September 30, alongside former Foreign Ministers Borge Brende and Ine Eriksen Soreide.

Who testifies on October 1?

Current Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide and former Foreign Minister Anniken Huitfeldt will appear on October 1.

What triggered the inquiry?

The Storting voted to establish the commission after newly released Epstein-related documents named Norwegian diplomats and politicians. Al Jazeera described the fallout as a political storm in Norway.

Has any wrongdoing been confirmed?

No. No specific findings have come out publicly as of the start of this week’s hearings. The inquiry is still gathering testimony.

When will the inquiry conclude?

No end date has been set. Parliamentary inquiries of this scope typically continue for some time after initial hearings before a final report comes out.

Related world coverage

Reporting sources

  • Caliber.az — Norway’s prime minister to testify in parliament over Epstein case. caliber.az
  • Al Jazeera — Epstein files set off Norwegian political storm: What we know. aljazeera.com

Treasury Yields End September: 10-Year at 5.26%

U.S. Treasury yields ended September at levels that keep borrowing costs high around the world. The Treasury Department’s daily par yield curve shows the 10-year note at 5.26% on 29 September 2026, the 30-year at 5.59% and the 2-year at 4.89%, based on Treasury’s published rates. The day before, the 10-year closed at 5.24% and the 30-year at 5.56%. These Treasury yields matter because they act as a benchmark for dollar borrowing.

Contents

The numbers on the last trading days

According to Treasury’s table, the 2-year yield slipped from 4.92% on 28 September to 4.89% on 29 September, while the 10-year rose from 5.24% to 5.26% and the 30-year from 5.56% to 5.59%. Long-dated yields edged up as short-dated yields edged down, so the gap between the 2-year and 10-year widened slightly to 37 basis points.

Weekly market data compiled by TradingKey, a market-analysis site, says the 10-year yield touched 5.225% during the week of 21-27 September before closing near 5.17%, and that Brent crude fell below $98 a barrel. Treat those as a secondary-source snapshot; the Treasury table above is the primary record. For the stock-market side of the same week, see our note on S&P 500 record highs alongside rising yields.

The Fed’s September hike

The backdrop is the Federal Reserve’s 16 September decision. The Federal Open Market Committee voted 12-0 to raise its target range by a quarter point to 3.75%-4.00%. In its policy statement, the Committee said inflation “remains elevated” and that the move would support a timelier return to its 2 percent goal, while describing economic activity as expanding at a solid pace. CNBC had reported on 14 September that the 10-year yield hit 5% before reversing as traders awaited the meeting, so yields have moved higher since.

How it reaches borrowers abroad

Consider a hypothetical Brazilian founder who raised a dollar-denominated loan last year. This is an illustration, not a reported case. If that loan resets against a dollar benchmark, higher U.S. rates raise the interest bill, and converting reais into dollars to repay it adds currency risk on top. The same logic applies to governments and companies that issue dollar bonds, and to exporters whose customers finance purchases in dollars. The effect varies by contract, so anyone exposed should read their own loan terms rather than rely on the headline yield.

Data that could move yields next

The coming week is crowded with releases. Our week-ahead economic calendar sets out the scheduled reports, and our coverage of Micron’s results shows how technology earnings are feeding the equity side. Surprises in jobs or inflation data are the usual catalysts for sharp moves in the 10-year yield.

Quick answers

What was the 10-year Treasury yield on 29 September 2026?

The U.S. Treasury’s daily par yield curve shows 5.26%, up from 5.24% on 28 September. The 2-year was 4.89% and the 30-year 5.59%.

What did the Federal Reserve do on 16 September?

The FOMC voted 12-0 to raise the federal funds target range by 0.25 percentage points to 3.75%-4.00%, according to its statement.

Why do Treasury yields matter outside the United States?

Dollar yields are a benchmark for global borrowing. When they rise, dollar-denominated loans and bonds generally cost more to issue or refinance, including for companies and governments outside the U.S.

Is a yield curve with 10-year above 2-year inverted?

No. On 29 September the 10-year yield (5.26%) was above the 2-year yield (4.89%), which is a normal upward-sloping shape.

Where can I check the latest yields myself?

The U.S. Treasury publishes the daily par yield curve rates on its website, and the Federal Reserve publishes the H.15 selected interest rates release.

Hurricane Polo Was the Strongest Storm Almost No One Saw Coming

Ten days ago, Hurricane Polo was a modest tropical storm off Mexico’s Pacific coast. By September 22, it had exploded into a Category 5 hurricane with sustained winds of up to 180 mph. That made it the second-strongest hurricane on record in the Eastern Pacific basin. The Hurricane Polo Mexico landfall that followed has triggered evacuations, school closures and flood watches. Those now stretch far beyond the coastline where the storm first hit.

Polo’s rapid intensification, gaining more than 100 mph in wind speed in roughly 24 hours, caught many forecasters off guard. It gave coastal communities in Baja California Sur only a short window to prepare.

The Hurricane Polo Mexico landfall, step by step

By the time Polo reached the coast, it had weakened considerably from its Category 5 peak. CBS News reported the storm made its first landfall in Baja California Sur as a strong Category 2 hurricane, with maximum sustained winds of 110 mph. It then weakened further, to Category 1 strength with 80 mph winds. Mexican authorities expected a second landfall in southern Sonora on the mainland shortly afterward.

Even at reduced strength, the storm carried enough moisture to trigger serious flooding concerns. The U.S. National Hurricane Center forecast 6 to 12 inches of rainfall across Baja California Sur. Sonora was forecast to see 4 to 6 inches, and locally up to 8 inches.

Heavy tropical rain and flooding linked to the Hurricane Polo Mexico landfall

Evacuations, shelters and school closures

Mexican authorities evacuated residents from vulnerable coastal areas, opened emergency shelters, and deployed military personnel ahead of the storm’s arrival, according to CBS News. Schools suspended classes in Acapulco as a precaution, even though the city sits well away from Polo’s direct path. That step alone shows how seriously officials treated the storm’s potential for widespread disruption.

Hurricane warnings were issued for parts of Baja California Sur and for a stretch of mainland Mexico running from Bahia Kino to Huatabampito. Tropical storm warnings covered both coasts of Baja California Sur as well as additional sections of the mainland.

A flood threat that reaches deep into the United States

Polo’s remnants are forecast to continue moving north into the southwestern United States. The National Weather Service has issued flood watches across 11 U.S. states, including Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa and Texas. Yale Climate Connections reported the flood threat extends from the Four Corners region eastward into the Central Plains. That puts more than 14 million Americans within the affected area.

That reach illustrates a pattern that has become increasingly common with Pacific hurricanes in recent years. A storm can weaken well below hurricane strength at the coast and still deliver its most dangerous impacts hundreds of miles inland. Those impacts usually take the form of flash flooding rather than wind damage.

What happens as Polo moves north

Forecasters will be watching how much of Polo’s moisture survives the journey north. They are also tracking how it interacts with existing weather patterns over the southwestern U.S. Local officials in the affected states are urging residents in flood-prone areas to monitor forecasts closely over the coming days. Low-lying and canyon terrain, where flash flooding can develop with little warning, carries the greatest risk.

Why Polo’s intensification matters beyond this storm

Polo jumped from a 45 mph tropical storm on September 21 to 150 mph winds by the next day. That kind of rapid intensification has become a growing focus for climate scientists. They are studying how warming ocean temperatures affect storm behavior. Faster intensification gives coastal communities less time to prepare, a pattern forecasters have flagged in several major storms in recent hurricane seasons.

FAQ: Hurricane Polo and travel to Mexico

Did Hurricane Polo make landfall as a Category 5 storm?

No. Polo peaked at Category 5 strength on September 22 while still offshore, then weakened before making landfall in Baja California Sur as a Category 2 storm with 110 mph winds, later dropping to Category 1 strength.

Which parts of Mexico were affected?

Baja California Sur took the first landfall, with a second landfall expected in southern Sonora on the mainland. Hurricane warnings covered Baja California Sur and the mainland coast from Bahia Kino to Huatabampito.

Which US states are under flood watches because of Polo?

The National Weather Service issued flood watches across 11 states, including Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa and Texas, as the storm’s remnants moved north.

How many people are at risk from flooding?

Yale Climate Connections reported the flood threat, stretching from the Four Corners region into the Central Plains, affects more than 14 million Americans.

Were there any casualties reported from Hurricane Polo?

As of the most recent reporting, no casualties or damage figures had been confirmed, though evacuations and shelter openings were underway in Mexico ahead of landfall.

Is it safe to travel to Los Cabos or Baja California Sur right now?

Travelers should check official advisories and airline notices before departure, since coastal areas of Baja California Sur were under direct hurricane and tropical storm warnings at the time of landfall.

More travel coverage

Sources for this report

  • CBS News — Hurricane Polo makes landfall over Mexico. See its path. cbsnews.com
  • Yale Climate Connections — After two landfalls in Mexico, Hurricane Polo’s rainmaking journey has just begun. yaleclimateconnections.org

Gates Cambridge 2027: US Round Closes 14 October

The Gates Cambridge Scholarship for 2027/28 entry is open, and the first deadline is close: 14 October 2026 for US citizens living in the United States. Every other eligible applicant applies in a second round that closes on 8 December 2026 or 6 January 2027, depending on the course. The details below come from the scholarship’s own timeline page and eligibility page. If you are planning a Gates Cambridge application, the round you fall into determines everything.

Contents

Which round applies to you

Round 1 is only for US citizens resident in the USA. Applications opened on 11 September 2026 and close on 14 October 2026 at 11:59pm UK time. Applicants are told their result on 14 December 2026, and scholarships are offered in early February 2027.

Round 2 covers all other eligible applicants, which is the majority of candidates. It also opened on 11 September 2026. The deadline is either 8 December 2026 or 6 January 2027, depending on the course, so the Cambridge Course Directory entry for your course is the authority. Decisions are due on 8 March 2027, with scholarships offered in early April 2027. In both rounds, winners have 72 hours after an offer to accept.

Who can apply and what is excluded

You must be a citizen of a country outside the United Kingdom and be applying to Cambridge for a full-time PhD, a full-time MLitt or a one-year full-time postgraduate course. A part-time PhD is also included through a pilot scheme. Current Cambridge students can apply for a new degree, such as an MPhil student moving to a PhD, but you cannot apply for funding to complete a degree already under way.

The scholarship does not fund undergraduate degrees, MASt courses, part-time degrees other than the PhD, professional programmes such as the MBA, EMBA, MFin or PGCE, several medical programmes, or the Master of Conservation of Easel Painting. Consider a hypothetical Vietnamese biochemist with a master’s degree who wants a Cambridge PhD: she would sit in Round 2 and would need to confirm her course’s exact closing date before anything else. This example is illustrative, not a reported case.

A working backwards plan

Because the scholarship competition runs alongside the course application, the course application is usually the first task. Note your round, find your course deadline in the Course Directory, and set your own deadline about two weeks earlier for references and documents. International applicants who need a student visa afterwards can use our visa eligibility checker to see the route that fits their situation.

Other UK funding to compare

Gates Cambridge is one of several UK awards with open cycles. Our guides cover the Chevening 2027 deadline and the Reach Oxford scholarship. The Rhodes Trust also states that applications for the 2027 Rhodes Scholarship are open, with entry to Oxford in October 2027; constituency-level dates are on its own pages. The Rhodes page lists coverage including Oxford course fees, a stipend of £20,400 for 2025-26, and student visa and health surcharge fees.

Applicant questions

What is the Gates Cambridge deadline for US citizens living in the US?

The US round closes on 14 October 2026 at 11:59pm UK time, according to the scholarship’s timeline page. Decisions follow on 14 December 2026.

What is the deadline for everyone else?

Round 2 closes on either 8 December 2026 or 6 January 2027, depending on the course. Applicants must check Cambridge’s Course Directory for their course’s date.

Who is eligible?

Citizens of any country outside the United Kingdom applying for a full-time PhD, full-time MLitt or full-time one-year postgraduate course at Cambridge. A part-time PhD is also eligible under a pilot scheme.

Which courses are not funded?

Undergraduate degrees, MASt courses, part-time degrees other than the PhD, professional programmes such as the MBA, EMBA, MFin and PGCE, and several medical programmes.

How long do winners have to accept?

The timeline page says successful applicants have 72 hours after an offer to accept in both rounds.