• Mon - Fri 9.00 - 19.00
Open

Author Archives: Francisca Samuel

Tamara's World  /  Articles by: Francisca Samuel

Author: Francisca Samuel

Francisca Samuel is an editor at Tamara News, where she covers immigration, travel, business and technology news for readers across Africa and the Gulf.

25 Oct 2026
Bangkok temple scene representing the new Thailand visa exemption rules for travelers

Thailand Quietly Cut Its Famous 60-Day Visa Exemption — Here’s What Travelers Get Now

Categories Visa Updates

Thailand quietly ended its generous 60-day visa exemption on September 15, 2026. It replaced the old rule with a tiered system that gives most Western visitors a shorter 30-day stay instead. The Thailand visa exemption rules now vary sharply by nationality. Travelers who have not checked the update since booking a trip could be in for a surprise at the border.

How the new Thailand visa exemption rules are structured

According to Thailand’s Tourism Authority (TAT), officials replaced the old 60-day blanket exemption with four separate categories. A 30-day visa exemption for tourism now applies to holders of passports from 60 countries and territories. That list includes Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A shorter 15-day exemption applies specifically to Seychelles and Mauritius. Azerbaijan, Belarus, and Serbia now need a visa on arrival instead of any exemption at all. Existing bilateral agreements between Thailand and individual countries still run alongside this system. Those offer stays of 90, 30, or 14 days, depending on the specific agreement in place.

Airport departure board showing international flights, illustrating travel affected by the Thailand visa exemption rules

Travelers from countries not on the 60-country list face a more complicated set of options. Some fall under the 15-day exemption. Others need to apply for a visa on arrival or a standard visa in advance. The absence of one single rule for every nationality is the central difference between this system and the one it replaced. A quick internet search for “Thailand visa” is no longer a reliable way to confirm entry requirements for every traveler.

A new cap on land border crossings

One of the more consequential changes limits how often travelers can use the 30-day or 15-day exemptions at a land border. Land entries now generally cap at two per calendar year, with exceptions for certain nationalities. That is a real blow to the common practice known as a border run. Visitors cross into a neighboring country and immediately return, resetting their permitted stay. That workaround loses most of its usefulness under the new cap.

Travelers who regularly commute across land borders for work or family reasons, not just tourism, are among those most affected by the new two-per-year limit. Thailand shares land borders with Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, and Myanmar, and crossings for day trips, shopping, or visiting relatives were common under the old rules. The new cap applies regardless of the traveler’s purpose for crossing, which has drawn some criticism from border communities that relied on frequent, informal crossings.

Why Thailand made the change now

The TAT summary does not spell out a single official rationale. It does lay out the timeline behind the Cabinet approvals that built the framework in stages. Officials first published the plan on May 21, 2026. They updated it on July 16, 2026. The final version appeared in the Royal Gazette on August 31, 2026, just ahead of the September 15 effective date. Industry coverage from TTG Asia frames the shift as part of a broader regional pattern, not a move aimed at any single country’s relationship with Thailand. Several Southeast Asian destinations have tightened long-stay tourist exemptions recently.

The net effect looks less generous on paper than the old 60-day rule. It still gives the large majority of long-haul visitors a full 30 days to travel without a visa application. That group includes travelers from North America, Europe, and much of Asia-Pacific.

What travelers should check before booking

Anyone planning a Thailand trip longer than 30 days, under the old assumption of a 60-day stay, needs to recheck their nationality’s category under the new rules. The TAT’s full list covers dozens of countries individually. It does not apply one blanket figure to everyone. Travelers planning multiple short visits using land crossings should factor in the new two-per-year cap too. Exceeding it could mean a turn-back at the border, or needing an actual visa instead of relying on the exemption.

The TAT notes its summary is not the Royal Gazette text itself. Travelers with an unusual itinerary or dual nationality should confirm their specific entry conditions directly with Thai immigration authorities or their nearest Thai embassy before departure.

Travel insurance providers have also started updating their own guidance to reflect the new rules. Overstaying a visa exemption, even unintentionally, can affect insurance claims filed during a trip. Travelers should treat the exemption category as part of their standard pre-trip checklist, alongside passport validity and any required vaccinations.

How Thailand’s move fits a wider regional pattern

Thailand is not the only Southeast Asian destination recalibrating its tourist entry rules this year. Several neighboring countries have revisited their own visa-free arrangements too. Visitor numbers are climbing back toward, and in some cases past, pre-pandemic levels across the region. The shared thread is a shift toward shorter default stays paired with narrower, nationality-specific exceptions. That replaces the broad blanket exemptions that were common only a few years ago.

What this means for digital nomads and long-stay visitors

Travelers who previously relied on the 60-day exemption to work remotely from Thailand for extended stretches face the biggest practical adjustment. A 30-day limit, combined with the new land-border cap, changes that calculation. Quietly extending a stay through repeated border runs is far less workable than it used to be. Anyone planning a longer stay should look instead at Thailand’s dedicated long-stay visa categories, which operate separately from the tourist exemption system covered here.

What happens next for Thailand’s tourism rules

The tiered system is now more than a month into effect. Expect Thai immigration authorities to clarify edge cases as more travelers encounter the new rules in practice. One open question is how the land border cap interacts with layover or transit travel. Thailand has adjusted its visa exemption framework more than once already in 2026. Further fine-tuning before the next peak travel season would not be a surprise.

For more on how entry rules are shifting across Asia, see Tamara News’ coverage of South Korea’s K-ETA exemption extension and China’s visa-free entry deadline.

25 Oct 2026
Travelers walking through an airport terminal representing the drop in Canada temporary resident arrivals

Fewer New Arrivals, More People With Work Permits: Canada’s Confusing New Numbers

Categories Canada, Immigration

New data from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada shows a sharp divide in what is happening to Canada’s temporary resident population. New arrivals have plunged. At the same time, the total number of people holding a work permit keeps climbing. The Canada temporary resident arrivals figures, published October 20, 2026, show combined new worker and student arrivals down 63% for the first eight months of the year.

What the Canada temporary resident arrivals data actually shows

According to figures reported by Immigration.ca, new worker arrivals from January through August 2026 totaled 130,095. That is down 57% from the same period in 2024. New international student arrivals fell even further, down 71%, to 65,240. Combined, the two categories totaled 195,335 new arrivals this year. That is a drop of 326,900 people compared with the same eight months two years earlier, a 63% decline.

Border crossing checkpoint booths tied to the latest Canada temporary resident arrivals data

Those numbers describe only the flow of brand-new arrivals. They say nothing about how many people are currently in Canada on a temporary permit. That second figure is moving in a very different direction.

The scale of the eight-month drop stands out even against a year that already saw tighter immigration policy throughout 2025. A decline of more than 300,000 new arrivals in a single comparison window stands out sharply. It represents one of the sharpest year-over-year shifts in recent Canadian immigration data. Officials have not published a single explanation for the size of the drop. It does follow a series of policy changes announced across both the student and worker streams over the past two years.

The work permit population is still growing

As of August 31, 2026, 1,550,215 people held a work permit in Canada. That is up 8.2% from 1,432,100 in August 2024, an increase of 118,115 people even as new worker arrivals collapsed. Timing explains the gap. IRCC processes applications under whichever rules applied when someone first submitted them. Permits approved years ago under looser policy keep adding to the total count, long after newer, tighter rules took hold.

Study permit holders moved the opposite way. Their total stock fell nearly 41%, from 1,019,545 in August 2024 to 602,115 in August 2026. That decline moved faster than the work permit population. It also lines up more closely with the sharp drop in new student arrivals.

Provincial breakdowns of the data, when IRCC eventually publishes them, are likely to show uneven effects across the country. Provinces that relied heavily on international students for local labor markets may feel the decline more acutely. That group includes parts of Ontario and British Columbia, compared with provinces that had a smaller temporary resident population to begin with.

Why the government’s own numbers lag its own policy

This gap between new arrivals and total stock is the clearest evidence yet of a slow-moving shift. Shrinking Canada’s temporary resident population will take years, not one policy switch. A work permit issued in 2023 or 2024 can still sit active in 2026. The full effect of newer, tighter rules will only show up in the stock figures once those older permits expire or go unrenewed.

IRCC’s broader data releases point to a system still working through a large volume of older applications. Recent figures on permanent residence and citizenship processing show that backlog clearly. Meanwhile, the front door for brand-new arrivals keeps narrowing fast.

Economists studying labor markets have flagged a related concern. Employers in sectors that depend heavily on temporary foreign workers may face staffing pressure. Agriculture and parts of hospitality are two examples, since new-arrival numbers are shrinking faster than employers can adjust their hiring plans. Whether that pressure shows up broadly in those industries this year is one of the open questions this data raises without yet answering.

What this means for anyone planning to come to Canada

For prospective workers and students, the 57% and 71% drops in new arrivals matter more than the headline stock figures. Those drops reflect the environment someone applying today is actually entering. The legacy population still working through the system does not. Combined with Express Entry’s recent shift toward high-wage job offers, the overall picture turns clear. Canada’s system is narrowing who gets in as a new arrival. At the same time, it keeps processing a large backlog admitted under older rules.

Prospective applicants should also note one thing. Processing times for existing applications have not necessarily sped up just because fewer new applications are arriving. A smaller inflow of new cases does not automatically clear a backlog built up from prior years of higher application volume.

A note on how to read government immigration data

Readers comparing these figures to other coverage should watch one distinction closely. A flow measures new arrivals in a given period. A stock measures the total population holding a permit on a given date. The two can move in opposite directions at the same time, exactly as they are doing here. Mixing the two up is one of the most common ways immigration statistics get misread in public debate.

How Canada’s numbers compare with past targets

The federal government set out a multi-year plan in recent years. Its goal is to shrink temporary resident numbers as a share of Canada’s total population. This data offers an early checkpoint on that plan rather than a final verdict. The sharp drop in new arrivals suggests the front-end levers, like tighter study and work permit approvals, are working as designed. Whether the back-end stock numbers follow at the pace officials originally promised remains the open question heading into next year.

What happens next with Canada’s temporary resident numbers

Expect the work permit and study permit stock figures to keep converging with the new-arrival trend over the next year or two. Permits issued under older rules will expire without being replaced at the same volume. IRCC has not announced further changes to arrival volumes. What already shows up in this data, and in the Express Entry reforms taking effect November 3, stands as the latest word for now.

For more on Canada’s shifting immigration rules, see Tamara News’ coverage of the new Express Entry high-wage points system and the Quebec worker selection program.

25 Oct 2026
Traveler holding a passport and immigration paperwork representing the new Express Entry high-wage points rules

Canada Just Brought Back Job Offer Points — But Only If You’re a High Earner

Categories Canada, Immigration

Canada is overhauling how Express Entry rewards a job offer. It is introducing Express Entry high-wage points worth up to 100 points for candidates with offers in better-paying occupations. At the same time, it is dropping the Labour Market Impact Assessment requirement that used to gate those points. Immigration Minister Lena Diab announced the change on October 16, 2026. It takes effect November 3.

How the new Express Entry high-wage points work

The reform creates a new scoring factor called the Labour Market Integration Factor. It awards Comprehensive Ranking System points based on job offers or Canadian work experience in 186 higher-paying occupations. According to CIC News, the thresholds work on a sliding scale. A job offer paying at least twice the Canada-wide median wage for that occupation earns 100 points. One paying 1.5 times the median earns 70 points. One paying 1.3 times the median earns 50 points.

Toronto skyline representing candidates affected by the Express Entry high-wage points reform

Candidates can also earn points for Canadian work experience in those same high-wage occupations, up to 70 points. They can add up to 80 more points for the overall length of their Canadian work experience. The combined cap sits at 150 points. IRCC will apply whichever sub-factor, job offer or Canadian experience, produces the higher score for each individual candidate.

Why dropping the LMIA requirement is the bigger change

For years, a job offer only earned Express Entry points if the employer had secured a Labour Market Impact Assessment. That is a government review confirming no Canadian worker was available for the role. The new rules remove that requirement for job offer points under the Federal Skilled Worker Program and the Federal Skilled Trades Program. Candidates updating their profile with a job offer must still follow IRCC’s instructions on confirming their LMIA status. The points themselves, though, no longer depend on it.

That matters for a specific reason. Express Entry stopped awarding job offer points entirely in March 2025, when the government scrapped the previous arranged employment points system. This reform effectively brings job offer points back. This time, though, wage level decides the score, not a labor market test.

Employers, not just candidates, have a stake in this change too. Securing a Labour Market Impact Assessment used to add weeks or months to the hiring process and cost employers legal and administrative fees. Removing that requirement for Express Entry points lowers the practical barrier for Canadian employers trying to recruit skilled workers already living and working in the country.

Who actually benefits from this change

The reform targets higher earners specifically. Candidates with Canadian work experience in a qualifying high-wage occupation will see the new points land automatically in their existing profile. They do not need to do anything to trigger it. Someone with an active job offer carries more homework instead. They need to confirm their occupation falls under the right category in the National Occupational Classification system. IRCC sets wage thresholds using the highest median wage recorded in the past three years. It draws on Job Bank, the Labour Force Survey, and the census to calculate that figure.

Candidates should treat IRCC’s official Express Entry overview page as the authoritative source once the full occupation list and wage thresholds publish in detail. Third-party summaries, including this one, are a starting point, not a substitute for the government’s own numbers.

Candidates working in lower-wage occupations, even those with strong Canadian experience otherwise, will not see the same benefit from this specific reform. The sliding scale rewards wage level directly. Two candidates with similar years of Canadian experience could see very different point totals, depending solely on how their occupation’s wage compares to the national median.

A pause on invitations while scores reset

IRCC has paused Express Entry invitations while it recalculates scores under the new system. The government says that process may take up to two weeks. Candidates who already hold an invitation to apply get assessed differently. IRCC will judge them against whichever occupation list applied on the date they received that invitation. In practice, the new rules will not reach back and change decisions already in motion.

Immigration consultants have advised clients not to make any changes to their profile during the recalculation window unless IRCC specifically instructs them to. Submitting unnecessary updates while the system recalculates scores risks confusion over which rules apply to a given profile, consultants say. IRCC itself has not flagged this as a formal concern.

How this fits into Canada’s wider immigration shift

This reform does not stand alone. Separate IRCC data, released the same month, shows new temporary resident arrivals falling sharply this year. At the same time, the total population holding a work permit keeps growing. Read together, the two trends point in one direction. Canada’s system is trying to be more selective about who it lets in as a new arrival. It is not simply letting in fewer people across every category at once.

What applicants are already saying online

Immigration forums and social media groups focused on Express Entry lit up within hours of the October 16 announcement, with mixed reactions. Candidates already working in high-wage Canadian jobs welcomed the change openly. Others worried the reform narrows their path further. That concern was sharpest among those without a Canadian job offer or local work history, after a string of earlier tightening measures throughout 2025 and 2026.

What happens next for Express Entry candidates

Once invitations resume, expect a noticeable shift in who gets selected. Candidates with high-wage Canadian job offers or work experience should see their relative standing improve. That is a real shift away from candidates relying mainly on language scores or education alone. Anyone currently in the pool should check now whether their profile’s occupation classification matches one of the 186 listed occupations. That single detail could be worth tens of additional points once scores recalculate.

For more on Canada’s recent Express Entry activity, see Tamara News’ coverage of the French-language Express Entry draw and the Canadian Experience Class draw.

25 Oct 2026
Gold medal in a presentation case representing the Nobel Prize economics 2026 awarded to Hall and Woodford

Two Economists Just Won the Nobel Prize for Explaining Why Central Banks Do What They Do

Categories Business, World

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the 2026 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences to Robert E. Hall of Stanford University and Michael Woodford of Columbia University on October 12, 2026. The honor recognizes decades of work on how governments and central banks can stabilize a volatile economy. The Nobel Prize economics 2026 announcement recognized research that sits underneath much of how modern central banks actually operate.

What the Nobel Prize economics 2026 recognized

Hall and Woodford built much of the theoretical foundation for stabilization policy. That branch of economics studies how to smooth out booms and busts. Left unchecked, those swings would otherwise whipsaw employment and prices. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, their combined body of work spans several areas. It covers how central banks should set interest rates. It covers how credible commitments about future policy shape current behavior. It also covers how to think about an economy’s capacity to grow without overheating.

City financial skyline reflecting the global economic backdrop behind the Nobel Prize economics 2026 award

Woodford in particular is closely associated with research on forward guidance. That term describes a central bank’s public commitment about its future actions. Woodford treated it as a policy tool in its own right. He separated it from the interest rate decision made at any single meeting.

Hall’s research extended beyond stabilization theory into measuring how efficiently an economy uses its resources. That body of work helped economists separate temporary slowdowns from more permanent declines in an economy’s underlying capacity. Distinguishing between the two matters enormously for policy. A central bank reacting to a temporary slowdown as if it were permanent risks setting interest rates wrong for years.

Why the Nobel Prize economics 2026 timing feels pointed

The announcement landed as central banks around the world are managing a genuinely difficult stretch. Inflation remains elevated. A geopolitical shock to energy markets, tied to tensions around Iran, has pushed oil prices higher. An AI investment boom is reshaping growth unevenly across countries at the same time. The International Monetary Fund’s own October 2026 forecast added to that picture. It described global growth as increasingly concentrated in a small number of economies. Inflation, the IMF said, is projected to rise rather than ease next year.

That backdrop turns stabilization policy into more than an academic exercise. It sits close to the daily job description of officials at the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank. Their counterparts worldwide face the same pressure right now.

The academy’s own framing

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has a clear pattern in how it awards the economics prize. It tends to recognize work that shaped real institutional practice, not just theory confined to academic journals. Al Jazeera’s coverage of the announcement noted that both laureates are American economists. That continues a long pattern of U.S.-based researchers dominating the prize’s recent history.

How this connects to today’s interest rate decisions

Hall and Woodford’s work does not dictate what any single central bank meeting decides. It shapes the intellectual toolkit officials bring into the room instead. Modern central bank statements spend as much time describing future intentions as they do announcing the current rate move. Woodford’s research on forward guidance is a big part of why that habit exists. The U.S. Federal Reserve is heading into its own October policy meeting soon. The tools Woodford helped formalize remain part of the standard playbook being applied there, and at central banks elsewhere.

Forward guidance, the specific tool most associated with Woodford’s research, works partly through expectations rather than through the rate change itself. If markets believe a central bank will keep rates low for an extended period, borrowing costs across the economy can fall even before any formal rate cut happens. That mechanism, once a novel academic idea, is now a standard part of how major central banks communicate policy.

What the economics community is saying

Economists outside the laureates’ own universities have broadly welcomed the choice. Several have noted that stabilization theory has rarely felt more relevant. This year combines an energy shock with an AI-driven productivity surge, which is exactly the kind of mixed signal the theory was built to untangle. Other commentators have pointed to a longer pattern in how the prize committee operates. It tends to reward work with decades-long staying power rather than the latest academic fashion. Hall and Woodford’s research fits that pattern closely, since both built their core ideas decades before this year’s prize.

Some critics within academic economics have also noted the limits of stabilization theory. The framework assumes policymakers can credibly commit to future actions and that markets believe those commitments. Real-world politics does not always cooperate with that assumption, particularly when central bank independence faces political pressure, as it has in several countries in recent years.

A brief look at the laureates themselves

Hall has spent much of his career at Stanford, where his research also touched on measuring productivity and the business cycle more broadly. Woodford, based at Columbia, is best known within the field for formalizing how expectations about future policy feed back into present-day economic behavior. Both economists have advised or consulted for policy institutions over the years, which is part of why their theoretical work ended up shaping practice rather than staying confined to textbooks.

What happens next for the laureates and their field

Hall and Woodford will receive the prize at the formal Nobel ceremony later this year, alongside the other 2026 laureates. Expect renewed academic and policy interest in stabilization theory. Central banks are still grappling with how to respond to supply-side shocks, like an energy disruption. Many of the tools they are using were originally designed for ordinary demand-side downturns instead.

For more on how global growth and monetary policy are playing out this year, read Tamara News’ coverage of the IMF’s October 2026 growth forecast and the latest oil price outlook.

25 Oct 2026
Aerial view of Paris, France, where officials are weighing targeted France curfew protests measures

France Promised Curfews, Not a Lockdown — Here’s the Difference

Categories World

France spent the back half of October trying to calm nationwide unrest. More than half a million people took to the streets on October 18, 2026. Some of those protests turned into looting and arson in several cities. The France curfew protests have eased since then. Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu’s government is still weighing targeted curfews rather than declaring the crisis over.

What set off the France curfew protests

The October 18 demonstrations combined two separate grievances. Students had already been protesting education conditions for weeks. A wider group of demonstrators turned out over the rising cost of living and fuel prices on the same day. According to Al Jazeera’s reporting, the protests spread into looting and arson in multiple locations. More than 2,500 people have been arrested so far.

Arc de Triomphe and central Paris avenue, a focal point during the France curfew protests unrest

The cost-of-living piece of the protests reflects a strain that has been building in France for months. Fuel prices climbed through much of 2026, squeezing households already dealing with higher grocery and housing costs. Unlike the student demonstrations, which focused on specific education policy complaints, the broader cost-of-living protests drew a wider crowd. That crowd included workers from multiple industries who do not typically join the same demonstrations.

A targeted curfew approach, not a nationwide lockdown

Lecornu did not impose a single blanket curfew. He said on October 20 that new curfews would apply only where local authorities judge them necessary. Each prefecture is coordinating directly with its own mayors. That is a notably different approach from a nationwide measure. It reflects how unevenly the unrest has actually spread across the country.

Digital Minister Anne Le Henanff took aim at a secondary problem: looted goods being resold online. She met with social media company executives to press them to remove listings for stolen merchandise. It was an unusual but direct response to unrest that spilled from the streets into e-commerce platforms within days.

Local officials in the hardest-hit cities welcomed the flexibility a targeted approach gives them. A single nationwide curfew would have applied even to areas that saw little or no unrest, a mismatch critics said would have punished calm regions unfairly. Mayors in cities that avoided serious violence pushed back early against any blanket measure, and Lecornu’s prefecture-by-prefecture approach appears designed partly to address that specific objection.

The government’s week of political meetings

Lecornu laid out a short, deliberate schedule after announcing the curfew approach. First came a meeting with union officials. Talks with political parties followed soon after. That sequencing suggests the government wanted labor groups on side before opening broader political talks. It is a sign of how seriously officials are treating the political risk here. They worry the unrest could become a vehicle for opposition parties, rather than staying a contained public-order problem. Euronews reported that President Macron separately denounced the rioting and looting directly.

Opposition lawmakers offered sharply different readings of the same unrest. Some on the left argued the protests reflect a genuine crisis of household purchasing power that the government has ignored for too long. Some on the right argued the demonstrations show a breakdown in public order that demands a tougher security response rather than further political dialogue. Lecornu’s government has tried to occupy a middle position, acknowledging the economic grievances while still promising a firm response to the looting and arson specifically.

Why the timing matters for France’s 2027 election

The unrest lands just over a year before France’s presidential election in April and May 2027. Macron cannot contest that vote himself because of term limits. Current polling puts Marine Le Pen of National Rally in the lead. Jean-Luc Melenchon of La France Insoumise sits close behind her. Both politicians have faced accusations of exploiting the protests for political gain. That adds extra pressure on Lecornu’s government to be seen managing the crisis competently, not just policing it.

Analysts covering French politics have noted that unrest this far ahead of an election rarely determines the outcome by itself. It can, however, shape which issues dominate the campaign once it formally begins. A prolonged standoff over cost-of-living measures would likely keep economic grievances near the center of the 2027 race. That would benefit whichever candidate voters trust most to address rising prices directly.

How this unrest compares with past French protest waves

France has a long history of large, disruptive street protests, from the 2018 to 2019 Yellow Vest movement to repeated pension reform strikes in recent years. What sets this round apart is the combination of two separate grievances. Student conditions and cost-of-living pressure arrived at the same moment, rather than one dominating the other. That overlap is part of why the government’s response has focused on local, targeted measures instead of a single nationwide policy.

Historians of French protest movements point out that sustained unrest often leaves a lasting mark. Even once it fades from the streets, its effect on policy debates can linger for years. The Yellow Vest movement, for instance, reshaped how French governments approach fuel tax changes long after the protests themselves ended.

What happens next as France tries to de-escalate

Monday night passed without major incidents, according to police. That is a sign the worst of the unrest may have passed for now. Demonstrators still called for a fresh round of protests on October 24. France’s main trade unions have not backed that call, though, which suggests the movement has fractured into smaller, less coordinated groups rather than disappearing outright. Whether Lecornu’s targeted curfews hold through the weekend will be the clearest early test of whether the government has actually regained control.

For more on how governments elsewhere are managing political and economic pressure, see Tamara News’ coverage of the EU’s Brussels summit on frozen Russian assets and the latest Russia-Ukraine peace talks.

1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 226