Author: Francisca Samuel

Francisca Samuel is an editor at Tamara News, where she covers immigration, travel, business and technology news for readers across Africa and the Gulf.

Israel Just Voted — And the Real Fight for Power Hasn’t Even Started

Israelis cast their ballots on 27 October 2026 in the first national election since the Hamas-led attack of 7 October 2023 and the war that followed. All 120 Knesset seats were up for grabs, and the vote has been widely framed as a referendum on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s long run in office. But as with every Israeli election, the count itself only sets up the real contest: Israel election coalition math, which decides who actually governs.

A race too close to call on its own

Pre-election polling, summarised by Al Jazeera, put the opposition bloc at around 52 projected seats against roughly 50 for Netanyahu’s religious-nationalist alliance of Likud, Jewish Power and Religious Zionism. Neither side was projected to reach the 61 seats needed for a majority. That gap is the whole story here: defeating Netanyahu at the ballot box, if that is even what happened, does not automatically remove him from power.

The opposition side is not a single party but a loose alliance. Yashar, the Democrats, Yisrael Beytenu and the Together alliance signed a non-aggression pact in September 2026 specifically to avoid splitting the anti-Netanyahu vote. Yashar’s Gadi Eisenkot is seen as the group’s likeliest candidate for prime minister, with Naftali Bennett of Together also mentioned as an alternative.

Why Israel election coalition math runs through two small parties

As reference tracking of the race shows, the Joint List and Ra’am, which together represent Palestinian citizens of Israel, are projected to win about 13 seats. In a Knesset where neither major bloc clears 61 on its own, that bloc of seats could end up deciding who forms the next government, whether by joining a coalition directly or by backing one from outside without taking cabinet posts. Most opposition leaders have so far rejected governing with Ra’am inside the coalition, which narrows an already tight path.

This is where Israel’s electoral system does its real work. Under proportional representation, no single party has ever won an outright Knesset majority, so every government since the state’s founding has been a negotiated coalition. The prime minister is not chosen directly by voters on election day; Knesset members effectively choose afterward, through weeks of bargaining over ministries, policy commitments and, often, personal rivalries.

The paths that are actually on the table

Several outcomes remain plausible once the final results are certified. A Netanyahu-led government is still possible if his bloc can find even a handful of additional seats through defections or late deals. An opposition-led majority is possible if Eisenkot or Bennett’s camp can stitch together support without relying on Ra’am’s votes inside the coalition. A minority government, propped up from outside by Arab-led parties that don’t take ministries, is a third route that has precedent in Israeli politics. A national unity government, or a rotating premiership arrangement between rival blocs, remains a longer-shot fourth option.

If none of that works, Israel would likely head to yet another election, a familiar pattern in a country that went to the polls five times between 2019 and 2022 alone. Netanyahu would stay on as caretaker prime minister in the meantime, which is itself a form of leverage in the negotiations to come.

What to watch next

The real signal in the days ahead will not be the headline seat count but which smaller parties start talking to which larger ones. Watch whether Shas and United Torah Judaism, the ultra-Orthodox parties that have both joined and abandoned Netanyahu’s coalitions before, swing toward him or stay on the sidelines. Watch whether Ra’am is offered any formal role or kept firmly outside the room. And watch how long the process takes: Israeli coalition talks have dragged on for months before, and a drawn-out negotiation is itself a kind of outcome, leaving Netanyahu in charge by default while his rivals try to agree on who should replace him.

Frequently asked questions

When is Israel’s 2026 election and why does it matter?
Israelis voted on 27 October 2026 for all 120 Knesset seats, the first election since the Hamas-led attack of 7 October 2023 and the war that followed. It is widely seen as a referendum on Benjamin Netanyahu’s long tenure as prime minister.

Did Netanyahu lose the election?
Pre-election polling put the opposition bloc at roughly 52 projected seats against about 50 for Netanyahu’s religious-nationalist alliance, with neither side projected to reach the 61 needed for a majority. The actual count determines nothing on its own; coalition talks do.

Who leads the opposition to Netanyahu?
Four parties, Yashar, the Democrats, Yisrael Beytenu and the Together alliance, signed a non-aggression pact in September 2026 to try to unseat Netanyahu. Yashar’s Gadi Eisenkot is seen as the likeliest prime ministerial candidate, with Naftali Bennett of Together also mentioned.

Why do Arab-led parties matter so much in this election?
The Joint List and Ra’am, which represent Palestinian citizens of Israel, are projected to win around 13 seats combined. With neither major bloc projected to reach 61 seats alone, those seats could decide who ends up forming a government.

How is Israel’s prime minister actually chosen?
Not directly by voters. Israel uses proportional representation, so Knesset members negotiate alliances after the vote until one side can command 61 seats. No party has ever won an outright majority on its own.

What happens if no coalition can be formed?
Israel would likely face another election, and Netanyahu would remain as caretaker prime minister until a new government is sworn in. That scenario has played out more than once in Israeli politics over the past decade.

For related coverage, see our reports on the proposed window for Russia-Ukraine peace talks and Venezuela’s own contested transition.

The Knesset building, the venue for Israel election coalition math negotiations after the 2026 vote

Samsung May Be About to Let Its Biggest Rival Build Part of Its Newest Chip

Samsung may be about to hand part of its most important new chip contract to its biggest manufacturing rival. Reports of a deal covering Nvidia Samsung HBM chips say Samsung will use TSMC’s 3-nanometre process to produce base dies for Nvidia’s next-generation custom high-bandwidth memory. That would mark the first time Samsung has worked with TSMC at the HBM manufacturing stage.

What’s Reportedly Changing With Nvidia Samsung HBM Chips

The Seoul Economic Daily first reported the arrangement on October 18, 2026. It cited industry sources. Reuters picked up the account, according to coverage in The Star. Samsung, TSMC and Nvidia have not confirmed the report themselves. Outlets covering it call it a supply-chain report, not a confirmed three-company announcement.

Nvidia Samsung HBM chips computer circuit board close-up

Why Nvidia Wants a Common Manufacturing Process

Nvidia unveiled its NVHBM memory standard in August 2026. Unlike conventional HBM, NVHBM places Nvidia’s own custom memory controller inside the base die. That gives the base die a more central role in the chip’s design. LetsDataScience reports that Nvidia asked its three major memory suppliers to use TSMC’s process for NVHBM base dies. Those suppliers are Samsung, SK hynix and Micron. Nvidia also asked them to standardize core dies around sixth-generation DRAM. A single shared foundry process would simplify validation for Nvidia. It would also make Nvidia’s custom memory implementation more consistent across vendors.

Samsung’s Balancing Act Between Rival and Customer

Samsung reportedly accepted Nvidia’s requirements after an internal review. It still plans to keep its own in-house production for standard HBM. It will also keep making custom memory it supplies to other customers. Samsung is also weighing whether its own foundry could produce NVHBM base dies itself. That option would matter if TSMC’s manufacturing capacity turns out to be insufficient to meet demand. It’s a hedge that would let Samsung fall back on its own fabs, rather than depend entirely on a competitor for a critical part of its biggest new product line.

A Pattern That Fits Earlier Reporting

A separate TrendForce report from October 9, 2026, said Samsung was exploring a dual-track approach to custom HBM production. Samsung could make base dies in-house or route them through an external foundry, depending on the customer. That report fits an external-foundry option for Nvidia’s business specifically. It doesn’t, though, confirm the specific October 18 arrangement. Taken together, the two reports point toward Samsung increasingly treating TSMC as a manufacturing partner for its most demanding AI memory customer. The two companies still remain direct rivals in foundry services more broadly.

Samsung and TSMC’s Long Rivalry

Samsung and TSMC have competed directly in contract chip manufacturing, known as foundry services, for more than a decade. TSMC has held the largest share of that market for years, while Samsung has positioned itself as the main alternative for companies that don’t want to depend on a single supplier. That rivalry has mostly played out in the production of logic chips, the processors that do the computing. Memory chips like HBM have traditionally stayed inside each company’s own vertically integrated supply chain, with Samsung designing and manufacturing its own memory from start to finish. A move to have TSMC manufacture base dies for Samsung-branded HBM would cross that line for the first time, blending two companies that otherwise compete head-to-head for the same foundry customers. It would not be the first time a tech supply chain has produced unusual partnerships between rivals. Apple, for instance, has long bought components from Samsung even as the two companies compete directly in smartphones. Analysts following the chip sector say this kind of cross-rival manufacturing deal has grown more common as AI chip demand outpaces what any single foundry can supply alone.

What Confirmation Would Mean for the Chip Supply Chain

Confirmation of the arrangement would mark a notable crack in the usual separation between Samsung’s and TSMC’s manufacturing operations. It would also signal how much leverage Nvidia now holds over its memory suppliers as the dominant buyer of AI accelerator components. Reporting so far says little about how SK hynix and Micron plan to answer the same TSMC-process request. That leaves open whether this becomes an industry-wide standard, or stays specific to Samsung’s arrangement with Nvidia.

Related Coverage on Tamara News

For more on the AI chip supply chain, see our coverage of Nvidia’s rapid AI data center build, TSMC’s latest earnings on AI chip demand, and Huawei’s push to close the AI chip gap with Nvidia in China.

Nvidia Samsung HBM Chips: Reader Questions

What is the reported Nvidia Samsung HBM chips arrangement?
A report that Samsung will use TSMC’s 3-nanometre process to make base dies for Nvidia’s next-generation custom HBM memory, first reported October 18, 2026.

Has this been confirmed by the companies involved?
No. Samsung, TSMC and Nvidia haven’t confirmed the report themselves, and outlets describe it as a supply-chain account rather than an official announcement.

What is NVHBM?
Nvidia’s custom high-bandwidth memory standard, unveiled in August 2026, which places Nvidia’s own memory controller inside the base die.

Why would Samsung work with a rival like TSMC?
To meet Nvidia’s request that its memory suppliers use a common manufacturing process for NVHBM base dies, standardizing implementation across vendors.

Will Samsung still make chips in-house?
Yes — reportedly for standard HBM and custom products for other customers, while it weighs whether its own foundry could back up TSMC capacity for Nvidia specifically.

Are other memory makers affected?
Nvidia reportedly made the same request to SK hynix and Micron, though neither company’s response has been reported in detail.

Gold Just Bounced Back Above $4,000 — Here’s the One Number Driving It

Gold and the dollar have been pulling in opposite directions for weeks. Monday’s trading showed why that gold price dollar strength link still drives the yellow metal’s swings more than almost anything else. Gold traded above $4,000 during Monday’s Asian session. That marked a modest recovery from near a three-month low. The US Dollar Index slipped toward 101.50-101.70 at the same time, according to FXStreet.

What’s Driving the Gold Price Dollar Strength Dynamic

A softer dollar and easing crude oil prices are lifting gold, rather than any single piece of economic data. A weaker dollar makes gold cheaper for buyers using other currencies, since gold is priced in dollars. That tends to lift demand and price together. FXStreet quotes Federal Reserve officials as signaling no urgency to raise interest rates immediately. That comment caps how far gold can run even as the dollar softens.

Gold price dollar strength currency exchange dollar bills

Why the Dollar Has Lost Ground

Two forces are pressuring the dollar this week. The first is the Fed’s own policy meeting on October 27-28. Futures price a 90.6% probability of a pause there, not a further hike. That reduces the dollar’s near-term yield advantage. The second force is geopolitics. President Trump said over the weekend that “there will not be a strike today” on Iran. That ruled out immediate action and pulled some safe-haven demand out of the dollar. Both forces have pushed the same way this week. That is part of why the dollar’s slide has looked steady rather than driven by one sharp headline.

The Risks That Could Still Flip the Trade

None of this volatility has fully disappeared. Israel holds a national election on October 27, and US midterms follow on November 3. Intelligence assessments cited by FXStreet suggest Iran could retaliate against regional sites in Israel and the UAE if strikes resume. A fresh escalation would likely reverse this week’s pattern fast. It would push the dollar back up as a safe haven. Gold would likely follow the broader risk-off move rather than rise against it.

What Traders Are Watching Next

Traders are also watching this week’s preliminary third-quarter GDP reading and the latest PCE inflation data, beyond the Fed meeting itself. Either report could shift the odds the Fed assigns to a rate increase at its December 9 meeting. Futures already price that move as close to certain. A hotter-than-expected inflation print would likely firm up the dollar and cap gold’s recovery. A softer one could extend gold’s bounce further.

Why Gold and Interest Rates Move Together

Gold pays no interest or dividend. That is why its price is especially sensitive to the returns available on safer assets like Treasury bonds. When the Fed holds or cuts rates, the opportunity cost of holding gold instead of interest-bearing assets falls. That tends to support gold prices. When the Fed raises rates or signals more hikes ahead, that opportunity cost rises instead. Gold often comes under pressure as a result. This relationship is part of why this week’s Fed meeting matters so much for gold traders, even though the decision itself is about dollar interest rates, not gold directly. The dollar link works in a similar way. Gold is priced in dollars globally, so a weaker dollar makes it cheaper for buyers using euros, yen or other currencies. That often lifts demand and price together, even when nothing about gold’s own supply or industrial use has changed. Both relationships help explain why a single week packed with a Fed decision, inflation data and Middle East headlines can move gold prices as much as any mining or jewelry news would. That is also why many professional traders track gold alongside the US Dollar Index specifically, rather than watching either market in isolation.

Where This Leaves Gold Investors

Gold remains well above $4,000 even after its pullback from recent highs. The gold price dollar strength link suggests the metal’s next move hinges more on the dollar’s path around this week’s Fed decision than on any gold-specific news. Investors holding gold as a hedge are, in effect, also betting on how this week’s rate decision and Middle East headlines play out.

Related Coverage on Tamara News

For more on the forces shaping commodity and currency markets right now, see our coverage of the oil market’s expected supply glut heading into 2027 and the IMF’s latest global growth forecast.

Gold Price and Dollar Strength: Questions Readers Are Asking

Why did gold recover on Monday?
Gold traded above $4,000 as the US Dollar Index slipped and crude oil prices eased, both of which tend to support gold.

What is the gold price dollar strength relationship?
Gold is priced in dollars, so a weaker dollar makes it cheaper for holders of other currencies, often lifting its price as a result.

Why has the dollar been weakening this week?
A 90.6% probability of a Fed rate pause and President Trump ruling out an immediate strike on Iran have both reduced demand for the dollar as a safe haven.

Could the dollar reverse course quickly?
Yes. A fresh escalation around Israel’s October 27 election or the Middle East could quickly restore the dollar’s safe-haven appeal.

What data could move gold and the dollar this week?
Preliminary third-quarter GDP and the latest PCE inflation reading, both due around the same time as the Fed’s meeting.

Is gold still near its highs?
It remains above $4,000 despite pulling back from levels closer to its recent highs.

Brussels Can Now Fine AI Companies — Here’s How Far That Power Reaches

Brussels has had the power to fine AI companies for more than two months now. A second deadline is approaching that will pull far more systems under its reach. EU AI Act enforcement over general-purpose AI model providers formally began on August 2, 2026. That is when the European Commission’s AI Office became entitled to investigate and penalize non-compliant companies. A December 2 deadline for AI transparency labeling is next on the calendar.

How EU AI Act Enforcement Actually Works

The European AI Office sits inside the European Commission. It can now request information and documentation from AI companies. It can demand access to models for evaluation, and order corrective or risk-mitigation measures, according to a client alert from law firm Wilson Sonsini. In serious cases, it can order a company to restrict, withdraw or recall a model from the EU market entirely. Fines can reach the higher of €15 million or 3% of a provider’s worldwide annual turnover. For the largest AI companies, that ceiling could run into the billions.

EU AI Act enforcement artificial intelligence data center servers

Which Companies and Systems Are Covered

The enforcement powers apply to providers of general-purpose AI models placed on the EU market on or after August 2, 2025. Models already on the market before that date generally get until August 2, 2027 to comply. That gives incumbent providers a longer runway than newer entrants. Companies whose models carry “systemic risk” face extra obligations. Those cover model evaluation, mitigating systemic risks, reporting serious incidents, and cybersecurity. This tier is aimed squarely at the handful of AI labs whose models are large or widely deployed enough to matter at a societal scale.

The Transparency Deadline Still to Come

Separately, Article 50 of the EU AI Act set transparency obligations that also took effect on August 2, 2026. These cover chatbots, systems that generate synthetic content, deepfakes, emotion-recognition tools and biometric-categorization systems. Providers and deployers must disclose that users are interacting with AI or that content was AI-generated. For systems already on the market before August 2, 2026, the machine-readable marking requirement under Article 50(2) doesn’t bite until December 2, 2026. That deadline gives companies running older AI tools only a few more weeks to add the disclosure.

How the AI Act’s Risk Tiers Work

The AI Act organizes obligations around several risk tiers rather than treating every AI system the same way. Systems judged to pose unacceptable risk, such as government social scoring, are banned outright. High-risk systems, including many used in hiring, credit scoring and law enforcement, face the law’s strictest requirements around testing, documentation and human oversight. General-purpose AI models sit in their own tier. That’s the category now subject to AI Office enforcement, since a single model can be built into many different downstream products. Limited-risk systems, mainly the chatbots and content generators covered by the transparency rules, face lighter disclosure-only obligations. Everything else falls into a minimal-risk category with no specific obligations at all. The enforcement actions now beginning target only the general-purpose and high-risk tiers. That is why most ordinary AI-powered apps and features are not yet facing scrutiny from the AI Office. Compliance teams at major AI labs have spent much of 2026 mapping their own products against these tiers. Misclassifying a system risks the wrong set of obligations entirely.

Why This Matters Beyond Europe

The EU AI Act’s extraterritorial reach means any AI company whose models reach EU users can fall under these rules. That holds regardless of where the company is based. The AI Office’s enforcement posture has become a reference point for regulators elsewhere weighing their own AI rules, even as some companies have lobbied for a slower rollout. For now, the practical question for most providers is less about headline fines. It is more about whether their existing disclosure practices will satisfy the December marking deadline.

What Happens as More Deadlines Arrive

The AI Office hasn’t yet announced its first enforcement action under these new powers. The law firm alert notes the office’s investigative tools — document requests, model access, corrective orders — are designed to be used well before a fine is ever on the table. The real test of EU AI Act enforcement will come once the December marking deadline passes. Regulators will then start checking which companies actually complied.

Related Coverage on Tamara News

For more on how AI companies are navigating regulatory and legal pressure, see our coverage of OpenAI’s policy shift on training its models on live internet data and the court ruling in Apple’s trade secrets case against OpenAI.

EU AI Act Enforcement: Reader Questions

When did EU AI Act enforcement begin?
August 2, 2026, when the European Commission’s AI Office gained formal power to investigate and penalize providers of general-purpose AI models.

How large are the potential fines?
Up to the higher of €15 million or 3% of a provider’s worldwide annual turnover.

Which companies does this apply to?
Providers of general-purpose AI models placed on the EU market on or after August 2, 2025; older models have until August 2, 2027 to comply.

What’s the December 2026 deadline about?
Systems placed on the market before August 2, 2026 must meet a machine-readable AI-content marking requirement by December 2, 2026.

What powers does the AI Office have short of a fine?
It can request information, demand access to models for evaluation, and order corrective or risk-mitigation measures.

Can the AI Office force a model off the market?
Yes, in serious cases it can order a model restricted, withdrawn or recalled from the EU market.

Good News for Most Visa Applicants in November — Unless You’re From India or China

The State Department’s November 2026 visa bulletin advances several employment-based green card dates for most of the world. Applicants from India and China, though, face yet another month with almost no movement in their categories.

What Changed in the November 2026 Visa Bulletin

The new dates are based on visa demand reported through October 5, 2026, according to Newsweek. For most countries, Mexico and the Philippines, EB-1 remains current. EB-2’s final action date advances three months to April 1, 2025. EB-3 advances one month to June 15, 2024. EB-3 Other Workers jumps five months to June 1, 2022, for the same group of countries. That is the single largest move in this month’s bulletin.

November 2026 visa bulletin passport with visa stamp

Why India and China Barely Moved

India’s EB-2 final action date stays frozen at November 1, 2013. China’s EB-2 holds at October 1, 2021. China’s EB-1 advances a single month, to August 1, 2023, while India’s EB-1 stays put at February 1, 2023. Both countries’ EB-3 Other Worker categories edge forward by just 14 days, to January 22, 2014, according to Erickson Immigration Group. China’s EB-3 moves separately to January 22, 2022. EB-4 holds at December 15, 2022 across the board. EB-5’s unreserved category stays current for most countries, with China fixed at December 1, 2016 and India at December 1, 2023.

What This Means for H-1B Workers Waiting on Green Cards

Douglas S. Pierce, a former USCIS supervisor who retired in late 2025, told Newsweek the lack of movement is especially significant for Indian and Chinese H-1B workers. “The biggest things that stand out are the lack of movement forward on India employment preference categories,” Pierce said. He added that H-1B workers from both countries are being “profoundly impacted by the lack of movement on these numbers.” Pierce linked the bulletin’s limited progress to other changes this year, including higher H-1B filing fees and changes to the PERM labor certification program and H-4 work authorization.

Filing Dates and What USCIS Will Accept

Separate from the final action dates, the bulletin’s Dates for Filing chart sets a later, more generous cut-off. That date determines when applicants can submit paperwork. For November 2026, the EB-2 filing date sits at March 15, 2026 for most countries, including Mexico and the Philippines. For India, it’s January 15, 2015. USCIS has confirmed it will accept adjustment-of-status applications using the Dates for Filing chart for November. That gives many applicants a few extra months to file before their final action date actually arrives.

How Priority Dates and the Visa Bulletin Fit Together

The visa bulletin’s dates matter because of how the US caps green cards each year. Congress sets an annual limit for each employment-based category. Demand from countries like India and China regularly exceeds that limit, since both countries have large numbers of pending petitions. When demand outstrips supply, the State Department sets a cut-off date. Only applicants whose priority date falls before that cut-off can move forward that month. A priority date is simply the date an employer first filed a petition on the worker’s behalf. India and China send far more petitions than the per-country limits were built to handle. That is why workers from those two countries tend to wait years longer than applicants from almost anywhere else. The imbalance is structural, not the result of any single policy change. It’s the main reason the same two countries land at the back of the queue nearly every month. That is also why India and China are listed as separate columns rather than folded into the “all other countries” category used for most of the world on the same chart. Most other countries move through their categories far faster as a result, since they share a single, much larger pool of available visa numbers each year.

The Caveat Every Applicant Should Know

The State Department routinely warns that cut-off dates can move backward. That happens if demand in a category exceeds the visas available for the rest of the fiscal year. Categories can also become temporarily unavailable altogether. Reaching your priority date on the bulletin isn’t the same as approval. It only means your case becomes eligible for the next stage of processing, which can still take months depending on USCIS workload.

Related Coverage on Tamara News

For more on the policy backdrop shaping these numbers, see our coverage of the DHS proposal to end deference on work visa extensions, the PERM suspension affecting major employers, and the $750 expedited visa interview pilot program.

November 2026 Visa Bulletin: Reader Questions

What is the November 2026 visa bulletin?
The State Department’s monthly update on employment and family-based green card cut-off dates, released in late October 2026 based on demand through October 5.

Did India’s EB-2 category move this month?
No. India’s EB-2 final action date remains at November 1, 2013.

Which category saw the biggest advance?
EB-3 Other Workers for most countries and Mexico, which advanced five months to June 1, 2022.

Can applicants file paperwork before their final action date arrives?
Yes, if their priority date is earlier than the Dates for Filing chart’s cut-off, which USCIS has confirmed it will accept for November 2026.

Why are H-1B workers particularly affected by this bulletin?
Former USCIS supervisor Douglas Pierce says the lack of movement in India’s categories compounds other recent changes, including higher H-1B fees and PERM program restrictions.

Can a visa bulletin cut-off date move backward?
Yes. The State Department can retrogress a date if demand exceeds the visas available for the rest of the fiscal year.