Europe’s New Travel Permit Was Supposed to Start by Now — Here’s Why It Hasn’t

Travelers hoping to understand Europe’s new entry rules got a clearer, if frustrating, answer this year. The ETIAS launch delay 2027 is now the European Union’s own expectation. It is not just rumor anymore. The European Travel Information and Authorisation System is a pre-travel screening step for visa-free visitors. The EU pushed it back indefinitely in August 2026.

Euronews covered the delay in detail. The EU had previously targeted a 2027 start. That date is now uncertain too. On its own website, the EU states plainly: “ETIAS is currently not in operation and no applications for travel authorizations are collected at this point.” The EU has promised to announce a firm start date several months before the system actually goes live.

Why the ETIAS launch delay 2027 happened

The delay traces back to a separate system called the Entry/Exit System, or EES. EES ran into technical trouble. EES began registering non-EU travelers at Schengen borders in April 2026. It collects facial images and fingerprints on first entry. The rollout did not go smoothly everywhere. Some airports, including locations in Milan, fingerprinted travelers again even after they had already registered once. Long queues and missed flights followed during the busy summer travel season. Officials want EES running reliably first. ETIAS depends on the same border infrastructure, so adding it on top of a shaky system risked compounding the problem.

ETIAS officials planned to present a revised timeline in the weeks after the August announcement. Some early rumors suggested a late-2026 launch was still possible. Most reporting treats a 2027 start as more realistic. Even that date carries real uncertainty. This system has slipped several times already.

What travelers need to do right now

Nothing, for the moment. ETIAS stays optional until the system actually launches, and no one can submit an application yet. Travelers from visa-exempt countries can keep visiting the Schengen area under the current rules. That includes the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. The EU has specifically warned travelers not to pay anyone who claims to offer ETIAS applications ahead of the real launch. Early scam sites have already tried to charge for a service that does not yet exist.

When ETIAS does launch, the plan calls for a cost of €20 per application. The EU expects to exempt children under 18 and adults over 70 from that fee. It also expects some family members of EU citizens to qualify for an exemption. The EU expects an approved authorization to last three years, or until the holder’s passport expires. It would cover stays of up to 90 days in any 180-day period.

How this fits into Europe’s bigger border overhaul

EES and ETIAS are two halves of the same plan. One tracks entries and exits digitally. The other screens visa-free travelers before they arrive, rather than only at the border. The EES side is already live, even with rough patches at some airports. The ETIAS side keeps slipping. That mismatch leaves travelers with biometric registration duties now. They still lack the pre-travel screening step the EU originally wanted to pair with it. The European Commission’s own ETIAS page still describes the system as “not in operation,” confirming the delay is not just press speculation. Readers tracking shifting entry rules elsewhere can also see how Thailand recently cut its visa exemption period and how India adjusted its own e-visa rules this same month. Neither of those changes took anywhere near the years of delay Europe has faced with ETIAS.

What comes before ETIAS finally launches

Expect three things before a real start date arrives. First, EES needs a stretch of smooth operation at major airports, not just improvement at a few locations. Second, the EU must formally lock in the €20 fee. That fee was still in a review period as of the most recent reporting. Third, the EU has committed to a public announcement several months ahead of launch. That should give airlines and travelers real lead time once it finally comes. None of those three steps has a confirmed date yet. Travelers should treat any site offering ETIAS applications today as premature at best.

Schengen area border sign relevant to the ETIAS launch delay 2027

FAQ: ETIAS launch delay 2027

Do I need ETIAS to visit Europe right now?
No. ETIAS is not in operation, and nobody can submit an application as of this writing.

When will ETIAS actually launch?
The EU has not set a firm date. Most reporting treats 2027 as more likely than 2026, though the EU has delayed this system multiple times already.

How much will ETIAS cost when it launches?
The planned fee is €20, with expected exemptions for children under 18, adults over 70, and some family members of EU citizens.

Is the ETIAS launch delay 2027 related to EES?
Yes. Officials cited technical trouble with the Entry/Exit System, which already requires biometric registration at Schengen borders, as a key reason for holding back ETIAS.

Which travelers will need ETIAS?
Visa-exempt visitors to the Schengen area, plus Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland, including travelers from the US, UK, Canada and Australia.

Should I pay a website for help applying for ETIAS now?
No. The EU has warned against paying anyone for ETIAS applications before the official system is live, since the real application process has not opened yet.

Does the ETIAS launch delay 2027 affect EES registration at the border?
No. EES registration continues separately at Schengen borders regardless of when ETIAS launches. The two systems are related but run on different timelines.

Singapore Keeps Its Passport Crown, But One Rival Is Closing In Fast

The Henley Passport Index 2026 has Singapore holding the top spot again. The bigger story this year is how much ground the United Arab Emirates has closed on the traditional leaders. The index ranks 199 passports by how many destinations their holders can enter without a prior visa. It shows a widening gap between the most mobile travelers and everyone else.

Singapore Stays on Top of the Henley Passport Index 2026

Singapore’s passport gives holders visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to 192 destinations. That is enough to keep it in first place, a spot it has held for several years, according to Travel And Tour World. No other passport matches that figure in the current rankings.

Henley Passport Index 2026 traveler at airport passport control

The UAE’s Climb to Second Place

The UAE now sits in a three-way tie for second with Japan and South Korea. Each offers access to 187 destinations. A decade ago, the UAE passport ranked far outside the top ten. Its rise reflects years of bilateral visa-waiver agreements the country has negotiated, though Henley’s published summary doesn’t break out the exact year-over-year gain. Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy and Switzerland share fourth place with 185 destinations apiece.

Where the UK and US Rank in the Henley Passport Index 2026

The United Kingdom sits sixth with 183 destinations, tied with Hungary, Malaysia and Poland. The United States ranks tenth, with access to 179 destinations. Both countries have slipped down the index over the past decade. Gulf and East Asian passports have added visa-free agreements faster than legacy Western powers have. At the other end of the list, Afghanistan ranks last among the 199 passports assessed. Its holders can enter just 23 destinations without a prior visa.

Why the Rankings Keep Shifting

Henley’s index is built entirely from the number of visa-waiver agreements each country has in place. That means it moves whenever governments sign new deals or suspend old ones. It is as much a snapshot of diplomatic relationships as of tourism convenience. A passport’s rank can rise even if its holder’s actual travel habits never change, simply because their government struck a new agreement with another state.

How the Index Has Shifted Over the Past Decade

Henley has tracked passport strength using the same travel-document database for years, which is part of why comparisons across editions are considered reliable. Singapore has sat at or near the top for most of the index’s recent history, while the biggest story of the past decade has been the Gulf region’s rise. The UAE’s jump from outside the top ten to a share of second place reflects a deliberate diplomatic strategy rather than a single breakthrough deal, built instead on a string of bilateral waiver agreements signed over several years. Traditional Western powers such as the UK and US have not lost agreements outright. They have simply added new ones more slowly than Gulf and East Asian governments have, which is enough on its own to erode a ranking even without any country tightening its own rules. The practical effect for travelers is that passport strength has become less tied to a country’s wealth or diplomatic weight alone, and more to how actively its government has pursued waiver deals in recent years. Henley compiles the index twice each year, so a country’s position can still shift by the time the next edition is published.

Which Regions Dominate the Top of the 2026 Rankings

The top tier this year is a mix that would have looked unusual a decade ago. A Southeast Asian city-state holds first place. A Gulf state and two East Asian economies share second place. Six European countries bunch together in fourth. That spread shows the ranking is no longer a story of Europe versus the rest. Gulf states in particular have spent years negotiating reciprocal visa-waiver deals, pushing passports like the UAE’s into contention with the traditional leaders. European passports still dominate the upper-middle of the table, but they no longer have the top spot to themselves.

What the Gap Means for Travelers

For travelers from the top ten, a visa is rarely the obstacle it once was. For those lower down the list, including Afghan nationals, a visa application is still a routine part of almost any trip abroad. That comes with the cost, paperwork and waiting time it always has. The Henley Passport Index 2026 doesn’t just rank convenience. It’s a rough proxy for how unevenly visa-free mobility spreads worldwide.

Related Coverage on Tamara News

For more on how visa access is shifting around the world, see our coverage of Dubai’s record year for golden visas, South Korea’s extended travel exemption, and the US pilot program for expedited visa interviews.

Henley Passport Index: Reader Questions

Which passport ranks first in the Henley Passport Index 2026?
Singapore ranks first, with visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to 192 destinations.

Where does the UAE rank this year?
The UAE ties for second with Japan and South Korea, each offering access to 187 destinations.

How does the UK passport rank?
The UK sits sixth, tied with Hungary, Malaysia and Poland, with access to 183 destinations.

Where does the US passport rank?
The United States ranks tenth, with access to 179 destinations.

Which passport ranks last?
Afghanistan ranks last among the 199 passports assessed, with access to just 23 destinations.

How is the Henley Passport Index calculated?
It is based on the number of destinations each passport holder can enter without a prior visa, drawn from bilateral and multilateral visa-waiver agreements.

Thailand Quietly Cut Its Famous 60-Day Visa Exemption — Here’s What Travelers Get Now

Thailand quietly ended its generous 60-day visa exemption on September 15, 2026. It replaced the old rule with a tiered system that gives most Western visitors a shorter 30-day stay instead. The Thailand visa exemption rules now vary sharply by nationality. Travelers who have not checked the update since booking a trip could be in for a surprise at the border.

How the new Thailand visa exemption rules are structured

According to Thailand’s Tourism Authority (TAT), officials replaced the old 60-day blanket exemption with four separate categories. A 30-day visa exemption for tourism now applies to holders of passports from 60 countries and territories. That list includes Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A shorter 15-day exemption applies specifically to Seychelles and Mauritius. Azerbaijan, Belarus, and Serbia now need a visa on arrival instead of any exemption at all. Existing bilateral agreements between Thailand and individual countries still run alongside this system. Those offer stays of 90, 30, or 14 days, depending on the specific agreement in place.

Airport departure board showing international flights, illustrating travel affected by the Thailand visa exemption rules

Travelers from countries not on the 60-country list face a more complicated set of options. Some fall under the 15-day exemption. Others need to apply for a visa on arrival or a standard visa in advance. The absence of one single rule for every nationality is the central difference between this system and the one it replaced. A quick internet search for “Thailand visa” is no longer a reliable way to confirm entry requirements for every traveler.

A new cap on land border crossings

One of the more consequential changes limits how often travelers can use the 30-day or 15-day exemptions at a land border. Land entries now generally cap at two per calendar year, with exceptions for certain nationalities. That is a real blow to the common practice known as a border run. Visitors cross into a neighboring country and immediately return, resetting their permitted stay. That workaround loses most of its usefulness under the new cap.

Travelers who regularly commute across land borders for work or family reasons, not just tourism, are among those most affected by the new two-per-year limit. Thailand shares land borders with Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, and Myanmar, and crossings for day trips, shopping, or visiting relatives were common under the old rules. The new cap applies regardless of the traveler’s purpose for crossing, which has drawn some criticism from border communities that relied on frequent, informal crossings.

Why Thailand made the change now

The TAT summary does not spell out a single official rationale. It does lay out the timeline behind the Cabinet approvals that built the framework in stages. Officials first published the plan on May 21, 2026. They updated it on July 16, 2026. The final version appeared in the Royal Gazette on August 31, 2026, just ahead of the September 15 effective date. Industry coverage from TTG Asia frames the shift as part of a broader regional pattern, not a move aimed at any single country’s relationship with Thailand. Several Southeast Asian destinations have tightened long-stay tourist exemptions recently.

The net effect looks less generous on paper than the old 60-day rule. It still gives the large majority of long-haul visitors a full 30 days to travel without a visa application. That group includes travelers from North America, Europe, and much of Asia-Pacific.

What travelers should check before booking

Anyone planning a Thailand trip longer than 30 days, under the old assumption of a 60-day stay, needs to recheck their nationality’s category under the new rules. The TAT’s full list covers dozens of countries individually. It does not apply one blanket figure to everyone. Travelers planning multiple short visits using land crossings should factor in the new two-per-year cap too. Exceeding it could mean a turn-back at the border, or needing an actual visa instead of relying on the exemption.

The TAT notes its summary is not the Royal Gazette text itself. Travelers with an unusual itinerary or dual nationality should confirm their specific entry conditions directly with Thai immigration authorities or their nearest Thai embassy before departure.

Travel insurance providers have also started updating their own guidance to reflect the new rules. Overstaying a visa exemption, even unintentionally, can affect insurance claims filed during a trip. Travelers should treat the exemption category as part of their standard pre-trip checklist, alongside passport validity and any required vaccinations.

How Thailand’s move fits a wider regional pattern

Thailand is not the only Southeast Asian destination recalibrating its tourist entry rules this year. Several neighboring countries have revisited their own visa-free arrangements too. Visitor numbers are climbing back toward, and in some cases past, pre-pandemic levels across the region. The shared thread is a shift toward shorter default stays paired with narrower, nationality-specific exceptions. That replaces the broad blanket exemptions that were common only a few years ago.

What this means for digital nomads and long-stay visitors

Travelers who previously relied on the 60-day exemption to work remotely from Thailand for extended stretches face the biggest practical adjustment. A 30-day limit, combined with the new land-border cap, changes that calculation. Quietly extending a stay through repeated border runs is far less workable than it used to be. Anyone planning a longer stay should look instead at Thailand’s dedicated long-stay visa categories, which operate separately from the tourist exemption system covered here.

What happens next for Thailand’s tourism rules

The tiered system is now more than a month into effect. Expect Thai immigration authorities to clarify edge cases as more travelers encounter the new rules in practice. One open question is how the land border cap interacts with layover or transit travel. Thailand has adjusted its visa exemption framework more than once already in 2026. Further fine-tuning before the next peak travel season would not be a surprise.

For more on how entry rules are shifting across Asia, see Tamara News’ coverage of South Korea’s K-ETA exemption extension and China’s visa-free entry deadline.

The UK Just Tightened Settlement Rules for Hong Kong BN(O) Visa Holders

New UK Hong Kong BNO visa rules took effect on October 8. They tighten the path to settlement for most people on the British National (Overseas) route. Under the Statement of Changes to the Immigration Rules, HC 584, most BN(O) visa holders now need five full years of continuous residence in the UK. That’s required before they can apply to settle permanently. It’s part of a wider package of changes the Home Office published, covering several visa categories at once.

The five-year requirement does not apply to applicants under the age of 18. They continue under different settlement provisions. For everyone else on the route, the change effectively standardizes BN(O) settlement timing. It now matches the continuous-residence approach used elsewhere in the UK’s immigration system.

What Else Changed Under the Same Package of Rules

HC 584 bundled the BN(O) update together with changes to several other routes. All took effect the same day. Skilled Workers who receive a positive Conclusive Grounds decision under the UK’s modern slavery identification framework may now qualify for broader work permissions, subject to eligibility requirements. Visitor visa rules were expanded too. They now cover attending workshops and debates, taking part in skills competitions, and allowing entertainment staff to support artists, musicians and performers during certain engagements. A related set of provisions for Erasmus+ exchange participants also took effect under the same statement of changes. Those cover training placements, traineeships, job shadowing and coaching assignments. Tamara News covered those specific rules in detail separately.

UK Hong Kong BNO visa rules illustration

Domestic Abuse and EU Settlement Scheme Provisions

The changes also expand eligibility under the Victim of Domestic Abuse route. They clarify coverage for certain children and for individuals who hold status under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS). They also address eligibility for applicants who were abandoned overseas by an abuser. On the EUSS itself, HC 584 makes technical amendments. These cover derivative rights of residence, how joining family members are treated, and application timing requirements. A separate suitability provision gives the Home Office new power. It can now refuse an application where an applicant has acted to frustrate immigration controls.

Why the New UK Hong Kong BNO Visa Rules Matter Most

Of everything in HC 584, the five-year settlement requirement is likely to have the broadest practical impact. That’s given the scale of the BN(O) route since its 2021 launch, as a response to the national security law imposed on Hong Kong. Applicants were previously uncertain about exactly when continuous residence would be assessed. Now they have a clearer, more conventional standard to plan around. It also means some applicants face a longer, more rigidly defined wait than they may have anticipated when they first applied.

What BN(O) Holders and Other Affected Applicants Should Do Now

Anyone currently on the BN(O) route should check how their continuous residence is being calculated against the new five-year standard. The same goes for anyone affected by the visitor, Skilled Worker, EUSS or Victim of Domestic Abuse changes. Applicants should also confirm which version of the rules applies to applications already in progress. For related coverage of how UK immigration policy has shifted across other routes this autumn, see Tamara News’ reporting on the Erasmus+ visa rules that took effect the same day, the UK’s ETA enforcement rules for visa-exempt travelers, and the upcoming shrinking of the Graduate Route to 18 months.

Common Questions About the HC 584 Changes

When did the new UK Hong Kong BNO visa rules take effect?
October 8, 2026, under Statement of Changes to the Immigration Rules HC 584.

How long do BN(O) visa holders now need to live in the UK before settling?
Most applicants need five years of continuous residence, with an exception for those under 18.

What other visa routes were affected by HC 584?
Skilled Worker modern slavery provisions, visitor visas, Erasmus+ participants, the EU Settlement Scheme, and the Victim of Domestic Abuse route.

Does the five-year rule apply to children on the BN(O) route?
No. Applicants under 18 are exempt from the five-year continuous residence requirement.

Can the Home Office now refuse applications on broader grounds?
Yes. HC 584 added a suitability provision allowing refusal where an applicant has acted to frustrate immigration controls.

Sources

China Entry Ban Rules: False Visa Statements Can Now Mean 1–5 Years

China’s new Exit and Entry Administration Provisions took effect on 15 September 2026, and the China entry ban rules are the part travellers should read first. A foreign national who gives false materials or statements in a visa or port-of-entry application can now face a ban of one to five years. DLA Piper reports that the State Council issued the rules on 31 July 2026. Before, the usual result of a false statement was a visa refusal.

What this covers

How the China entry ban rules work

DLA Piper describes three triggers for foreign nationals under Article 5. The first is false information in a visa or entry application, which can bring a ban of one to five years. The second is a past criminal or administrative penalty for disrupting border administration, committing document fraud or crossing a border illegally, which can bring the same one-to-five-year ban. The third is placement on a countermeasures list, the Unreliable Entity List or the Malicious Entity List, which can lead to denial of a visa or entry.

The shift matters because of scale. A single wrong answer on a form now carries a multi-year consequence. The rules do not define a minor mistake, so applicants should treat every field as a sworn statement.

China entry ban rules apply to visitors, students and business travellers alike
The Great Wall at Badaling, one of China’s busiest visitor sites.

Exit bans on Chinese citizens

The Provisions also target Chinese citizens. According to DLA Piper, a person who commits fraud to obtain exit-entry documents, or crosses borders illegally, may face an exit ban of six months to three years after serving an administrative penalty. A person whose conduct overseas endangers national security or interests faces the same range after returning to China. Export-control and technology-transfer violations can also lead to an exit ban, with no fixed duration.

Authorities should generally tell the person in writing about the facts, reasons, legal basis and remedies. They can withhold notice where national security or a criminal case is involved. For multinational employers, the law-firm briefing at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck says the rules raise the risk for staff who handle sensitive technology.

Visa agents must register

Intermediary agencies that provide immigration, visa and related services must register. New agencies have 15 days from establishment. Existing agencies have 90 days after the Provisions took effect. Foreign enterprises and institutions cannot provide these intermediary services in China, though lawfully established foreign-invested enterprises can.

The practical advice is simple. Ask any agent you hire whether it is registered, and keep your own copy of everything it submits for you. A recap from Clark Hill also notes that foreign visitors staying in private homes can register online within 24 hours. That recap gives no effective date for the online option, so confirm it with the National Immigration Administration.

What the rules leave open

The published summaries leave several questions unanswered. They do not define what counts as a false statement, and they do not say how officials will decide between an honest error and deliberate fraud. They also do not say whether a ban applies from the date of the false statement or from the date officials find it. Until China publishes guidance, travellers should assume the strictest reading.

The rules also arrive at a time when many firms send engineers and buyers to China on short notice. Short-notice trips make mistakes more likely, because staff copy answers from old forms. A five-minute review by a second person can prevent a problem that lasts years. Plan early. Check twice. Keep records.

What travellers should do before booking

Take a hypothetical Brazilian project manager, Rafael, who plans a factory visit in Shenzhen. He should answer each question on his application exactly, attach matching invitation documents, and avoid sharing a pre-filled form he has not read. If he later spots an error, he should correct it before submitting rather than hoping nobody checks. Rafael is an illustration only.

Employers should brief staff in the same way. The DLA Piper note advises companies to check that visa applications and entry declarations are truthful, accurate and complete. It also advises companies in controlled-technology sectors to remind staff about export-control rules before they travel.

If you are comparing visa-friendly destinations, see how Asia’s rules differ in our report on Thailand’s visa exemption rules and our note on Japan’s renewal fees. You can also run a quick check with our visa eligibility checker.

China rules: your questions

When did the new rules start?

The Exit and Entry Administration Provisions took effect on 15 September 2026, after the State Council issued them on 31 July 2026.

How long can an entry ban last?

For false information or past border-related penalties, DLA Piper reports a ban of one to five years.

Do the rules also affect Chinese citizens?

Yes. They allow exit bans of six months to three years for certain fraud, border and national-security offences, plus exit bans for some export-control violations.

Must visa agents register?

Yes. New agencies register within 15 days, and existing ones within 90 days after the rules took effect.

What is the safest way to apply?

Give accurate, complete answers, attach consistent documents and use a registered intermediary if you hire one.

Sources