Hackers Turned French Supermarket Fridges Into Ovens

A French supermarket cyberattack disabled refrigeration systems at hundreds of stores this week, pushing fridges and freezers as high as 50°C and forcing retailers to throw out large volumes of spoiled food. Carrefour said 80 of its stores were hit, Les Mousquetaires (owner of Intermarché) reported about 150 affected locations, Monoprix said roughly 5% of its 490 stores were struck, and Cooperative U also confirmed it was targeted. E.Leclerc and Auchan did not respond to requests for comment.

At Intermarché, cooling units stayed overheated for six hours overnight, well past the point where stored food becomes unsafe to sell. The retailer’s chief executive said the attack would cost “tens of millions of euros nationwide in a single day” once spoiled stock across the network is tallied.

How the French supermarket cyberattack worked

Supermarket cold aisles are typically run by networked control panels that let maintenance contractors adjust temperatures remotely over the internet — a convenience that also creates an attack surface. A source close to Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu said France’s national cybersecurity agency, ANSSI, traced the intrusion to a vulnerability in refrigeration control software made by the Danish manufacturer Danfoss.

Danfoss said the affected units were running outdated firmware and that it had repeatedly urged customers to update their systems. Security researchers at Claroty’s Team82 had already published findings in August about vulnerabilities in a specific Danfoss controller model, the AK-SM 800A, which later firmware updates addressed — though the company has not confirmed that this was the exact model exploited in this week’s attack.

Computer code on a screen representing the hack behind the French supermarket cyberattack

A wider European footprint than first reported

France was the hardest-hit country, but security researcher Felix Aime of the firm Sekoia said similar disruptions also hit retailers in Spain, Portugal, Poland, Germany and Belgium. No group has claimed responsibility for the campaign, and investigators have not yet said whether the European incidents share a single origin or represent copycat activity exploiting the same known flaw.

The Paris prosecutor’s office has opened an investigation and described the campaign as a large-scale attack. Lecornu ordered ANSSI to lead the technical response, and French officials are coordinating with counterparts elsewhere in Europe while assessing whether other companies using similar industrial control systems are exposed.

Food safety and the clean-up

Affected stores discarded spoiled stock rather than risk selling food that had sat above safe temperatures for hours, a decision retailers described as necessary to eliminate health risk rather than optional caution. The French retail federation FCD publicly called on Danfoss for full transparency about the scope of the vulnerability, and some of the hardest-hit stores had reopened for business by midweek once technicians restored manual control over the cooling systems.

The incident echoes a smaller episode in late August, when roughly a dozen US military commissaries reported similar refrigeration failures and food losses, though officials have not formally linked the two events. Separately, Dutch retailer Ahold Delhaize reported what it called a “security issue” on its own network around the same time, while stating there was no reason to connect it to the French attacks.

Where this investigation goes from here

With no group claiming responsibility and the entry point only partly confirmed, French investigators face a familiar challenge in industrial-control cyberattacks: proving exactly how attackers got in versus simply patching the hole they used. Retailers across the affected countries are now under pressure to audit which of their own refrigeration and building-management systems run outdated firmware, since the underlying weakness — internet-connected equipment nobody got around to updating — is common across the sector, not unique to Danfoss customers in France.

Expect regulators in Brussels and national cybersecurity agencies to use the episode to push for mandatory patching timelines on industrial control systems, a debate that has simmered in EU policy circles for years without resulting in binding rules for retail infrastructure specifically.

Common questions about the attack

How many stores were affected?
At least 80 Carrefour stores, about 150 Intermarché locations, roughly 5% of Monoprix’s 490 stores, and an unconfirmed number of Cooperative U stores — likely several hundred in total across France.

What caused the fridges to overheat?
Investigators say attackers exploited a vulnerability in Danfoss refrigeration control software running outdated firmware, letting them remotely push temperatures as high as 50°C.

Did other countries get hit?
Yes. A security researcher reported similar disruptions in Spain, Portugal, Poland, Germany and Belgium, though France was hit hardest.

Has anyone claimed responsibility?
No group had claimed the attack at the time of reporting.

How much will this cost retailers?
Intermarché’s CEO estimated losses of tens of millions of euros nationwide in a single day; no industry-wide total has been published.

Is the food safe once stores reopen?
Retailers discarded stock that sat above safe temperatures and reopened only after restoring manual control of cooling systems, according to the French retail federation.

Sources

  • ABC News Australia — Hackers raise fridge temperatures at hundreds of French supermarkets to spoil food. abc.net.au
  • BleepingComputer — Cyberattack shuts down refrigerators at French supermarkets. bleepingcomputer.com

For more on recent breaches, see our coverage of the Denmark CPR register breach and the Berlin ransomware attack.

The UK Just Named Iran’s Spy Chief in an Airbase Plot

The UK sanctions Iranian nationals it accuses of directing a suspected plot against RAF Fairford, the Gloucestershire airbase that serves as the main European staging point for US bombers. Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announced the sanctions on October 12, hours after Prime Minister Andy Burnham told Parliament the alleged scheme was “almost certainly” directed by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

The two men named are Ruhollah Bazghandi, described by the UK as the head of IRGC counterespionage operations, and Shahram Ali Reza Tamarzadeh Jakki, identified as a facilitator for the Zindashti criminal network, which London already sanctions over alleged plots against Iranian dissidents abroad. Both now face an asset freeze and a UK travel ban; Bazghandi is additionally barred from serving as a company director in Britain.

What happened at RAF Fairford

The case traces back to September 27, when police arrested five British men in their 20s near RAF Fairford on suspicion of terrorism and explosives offences. Officers found petrol stored in three vans linked to the suspects but no explosives, and all five were released on bail without charge. Two more people, including a British-Iranian national, were arrested later and also released without charge. No one has been charged in the case to date, and the precise nature of the threat remains publicly unclear.

Fairford’s significance comes from its role as the preferred European base for US B-52 and B-1 bombers supporting the war against Iran that began in February. Earlier in October, the US moved bomber aircraft from the base over concerns about a suspected Iranian plot involving a complex drone attack, according to officials who spoke to American outlets.

Government building in Iran, the country named after the UK sanctions Iranian nationals over Fairford

Why the UK sanctions Iranian nationals over the IRGC link

Burnham told MPs the UK “will not tolerate these threats on our soil” and pledged further sanctions against Iran and the IRGC specifically over its alleged use of criminal networks on British territory. Miliband also summoned Iran’s ambassador to the Foreign Office over the allegations. The government has not published the underlying intelligence behind its assessment, and the case remains under active investigation with no charges filed.

Iran denies any involvement. Ambassador Ali Mousavi met UK Middle East minister Stephen Doughty and rejected the claims, urging Britain to avoid what he called unsubstantiated accusations. Iran’s state news agency IRNA reported that Tehran says it is willing to cooperate with the investigation. Earlier, in September, Iran’s embassy in London dismissed the accusations as “unfounded and malicious speculations” that it said would fuel “Iranophobia propaganda.”

A 29-country statement adds diplomatic weight

On the same day as the sanctions announcement, 29 countries — including the US, most of Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand — issued a joint statement condemning Iran’s alleged use of violent attacks abroad, citing lethal plotting, arson, sabotage and cyber-attacks. The coordinated statement signals that the Fairford case is being treated as part of a wider pattern Western governments say they have tracked across multiple countries, rather than an isolated incident.

The sanctions come at a moment of heightened friction between London and Tehran. Burnham’s government has already imposed several rounds of IRGC-linked sanctions this year, and Monday’s announcement extends that pattern rather than marking a sudden shift in UK policy.

Where the Fairford case goes from here

With no charges filed against any of the seven people arrested in connection with Fairford, the case remains open. British prosecutors would need to bring formal charges before any courtroom test of the government’s claims, and Iran’s denial means the diplomatic standoff is likely to continue regardless of how the criminal investigation proceeds. The newly sanctioned pair are unlikely to have meaningful UK-based assets to freeze, so the measures function mainly as a diplomatic signal rather than a financial one.

Analysts will also be watching whether the 29-country statement leads to coordinated sanctions elsewhere, since joint statements of that kind have sometimes preceded synchronized diplomatic or economic measures against Tehran in the past.

Readers’ questions, answered

Who exactly did the UK sanction?
Ruhollah Bazghandi, described as the IRGC’s counterespionage chief, and Shahram Ali Reza Tamarzadeh Jakki, a facilitator the UK links to the Zindashti criminal network.

Has anyone been charged over the Fairford plot?
No. Seven people were arrested in connection with the case and all were released without charge; the investigation remains open.

What does Iran say about the allegations?
Iran denies any involvement, calls the claims unsubstantiated, and says through its London embassy that it is willing to cooperate with investigators.

Why is RAF Fairford significant?
It is the main European base for US bombers supporting operations tied to the war against Iran, making it a high-value target in the eyes of UK and US officials.

What do the sanctions actually do?
They freeze any UK-based assets belonging to the two men, bar them from travelling to Britain, and in Bazghandi’s case prevent him from serving as a UK company director.

Did other countries join in?
Yes. Twenty-nine countries, including the US and most of Europe, issued a joint statement the same day condemning Iran’s alleged use of violent plots abroad.

Sources

  • Al Jazeera — UK blames Iran for airbase plot, sanctions two Iranian nationals. aljazeera.com
  • The National — ‘Iran smells weakness’: Burnham challenged over IRGC after airbase plot. thenationalnews.com

For related coverage, see our reports on the Strait of Hormuz standoff, the US strike on Kermanshah, and the renewed US travel warning for Iran.

Riyadh’s Main Airport Just Got Shut Down Until October 17 — Here’s Why

The Riyadh airport closure at King Khalid International Airport (RUH) has been extended to October 17, Saudi officials said this week, after Houthi forces fired missiles and drones at the Saudi capital for a third straight day. The closure follows a deadly weekend strike that killed at least 14 people and injured roughly 320 more, and it has already forced airlines on four continents to cancel or reroute flights.

Saudi Arabia’s air defences intercepted a ballistic missile aimed at Riyadh and two more aimed at the southwestern city of Khamis Mushait on Monday, according to coalition spokesperson Turki al-Maliki, who said all three were “intercepted and destroyed.” The Houthis claimed credit for both strikes, saying their main target was King Khalid International Airport itself, with a secondary drone launched at a military airbase near Khamis Mushait.

Why the Riyadh airport closure keeps getting pushed back

Saudi authorities first shut the airport after Saturday’s attack, which Houthi spokesman Yahya Saree said targeted the facility directly. A Saudi investigation, described to the Associated Press by officials speaking anonymously, found that Houthi forces launched a wave of drones first to draw out air defences, then followed with cruise and ballistic missiles that travelled more than 1,000 kilometres (620 miles) to reach the capital. Investigators are now trying to work out why the kingdom’s Patriot interceptor batteries gave no earlier warning for weapons flying that distance.

Saudi Arabia’s civil aviation authority says crews are still checking the airport’s physical safety and operational readiness before reopening, which is why the closure has already been pushed back once, from an initial reopening target to October 17.

Closed airport terminal building similar to the one affected by the Riyadh airport closure

Airlines cancel flights as the closure drags on

The disruption has rippled across the global aviation map. Etihad Airways cancelled all Riyadh flights until next week and suspended services to Dammam and Jeddah as a precaution. Gulf Air cancelled Riyadh flights through Saturday. Delta Air Lines postponed the planned launch of its new nonstop Atlanta–Riyadh route, which had been due to start October 23. Turkish Airlines, Air India Express, SriLankan Airlines and several Gulf carriers also cut services earlier in the week, and flight-tracking data showed aircraft actively diverting around Riyadh airspace while traffic built up at Jeddah instead.

The disruption has also hit Saudi Arabia’s events calendar. The kingdom’s flagship investment conference and the World Petroleum Congress energy gathering were both disrupted, and several oil executives were pulled from the WPC programme as a result.

Saudi officials signal a tougher response

Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman told reporters the airport attacks have tested the kingdom’s resilience and that “our response must be equally serious,” while insisting that Vision 2030 investment plans would continue regardless. The Houthis, for their part, warned international airlines and travellers to avoid Saudi airports entirely — except those serving Mecca and Medina — calling the facilities “unsafe,” and separately warned workers at Saudi oil sites and airports to stay away, describing them as “legitimate targets.”

US President Donald Trump said the Houthis are “misbehaving very badly” but gave no indication Washington would intervene militarily, even as Saudi officials privately pushed for more direct US involvement. A UAE diplomat, Anwar Gargash, called for “joint Gulf action,” arguing that attacks on Saudi Arabia threaten the security of the wider Gulf region.

What happens next for travelers

Passengers with bookings through Riyadh in the coming days should check status directly with their airline rather than assume flights will resume on schedule, since the October 17 date itself has already slipped once. Travelers connecting through Jeddah may see knock-on congestion as traffic diverts there. Airlines serving Mecca and Medina have largely kept those routes running, since the Houthis have specifically exempted the two holy cities from their warnings.

The Houthis are fighting forces aligned with Yemen’s internationally recognised government, and the Saudi-led coalition has run an air campaign against them for years. The latest escalation has unfolded alongside wider regional tensions tied to the broader US-Israel confrontation with Iran, which Houthi leaders have cited as part of their motivation for targeting Saudi infrastructure.

Frequently asked questions

When will Riyadh’s airport reopen?
Saudi authorities currently say King Khalid International Airport will reopen October 17, though that date has already been extended once and could move again depending on the security assessment.

How many people have been killed in the attacks?
At least 14 people have died and roughly 320 have been injured across the string of attacks this month, according to Saudi officials cited by international wire services.

Which airlines have cancelled Riyadh flights?
Etihad, Gulf Air, Turkish Airlines, Air India Express, SriLankan Airlines and Delta have all cancelled, suspended or postponed Riyadh services, with several extending cancellations into next week.

Are flights to Mecca and Medina affected?
The Houthis have said those two cities are not targets, and most carriers have kept those routes operating.

Is the US getting involved militarily?
Not directly. The US has provided intelligence and planning support to Saudi Arabia, but President Trump has stopped short of ordering strikes on Houthi positions.

Why do the attacks keep happening?
The Houthis say the strikes are tied to the broader regional conflict involving the US and Israel’s confrontation with Iran, and they have vowed to continue targeting Saudi airports and oil facilities they consider linked to that fight.

Sources

  • Al Jazeera — Houthi missile attack targets Saudi capital Riyadh for third day in a row. aljazeera.com
  • ABC News Australia — Saudis probe Houthi attack on Riyadh airport amid ongoing attack. abc.net.au

For more on the regional fallout, see our coverage of the Bab el-Mandeb shipping disruption, the US travel advisory for Saudi Arabia, and the earlier first Houthi strike on Riyadh that began this run of attacks.

China Entry Ban Rules: False Visa Statements Can Now Mean 1–5 Years

China’s new Exit and Entry Administration Provisions took effect on 15 September 2026, and the China entry ban rules are the part travellers should read first. A foreign national who gives false materials or statements in a visa or port-of-entry application can now face a ban of one to five years. DLA Piper reports that the State Council issued the rules on 31 July 2026. Before, the usual result of a false statement was a visa refusal.

What this covers

How the China entry ban rules work

DLA Piper describes three triggers for foreign nationals under Article 5. The first is false information in a visa or entry application, which can bring a ban of one to five years. The second is a past criminal or administrative penalty for disrupting border administration, committing document fraud or crossing a border illegally, which can bring the same one-to-five-year ban. The third is placement on a countermeasures list, the Unreliable Entity List or the Malicious Entity List, which can lead to denial of a visa or entry.

The shift matters because of scale. A single wrong answer on a form now carries a multi-year consequence. The rules do not define a minor mistake, so applicants should treat every field as a sworn statement.

China entry ban rules apply to visitors, students and business travellers alike
The Great Wall at Badaling, one of China’s busiest visitor sites.

Exit bans on Chinese citizens

The Provisions also target Chinese citizens. According to DLA Piper, a person who commits fraud to obtain exit-entry documents, or crosses borders illegally, may face an exit ban of six months to three years after serving an administrative penalty. A person whose conduct overseas endangers national security or interests faces the same range after returning to China. Export-control and technology-transfer violations can also lead to an exit ban, with no fixed duration.

Authorities should generally tell the person in writing about the facts, reasons, legal basis and remedies. They can withhold notice where national security or a criminal case is involved. For multinational employers, the law-firm briefing at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck says the rules raise the risk for staff who handle sensitive technology.

Visa agents must register

Intermediary agencies that provide immigration, visa and related services must register. New agencies have 15 days from establishment. Existing agencies have 90 days after the Provisions took effect. Foreign enterprises and institutions cannot provide these intermediary services in China, though lawfully established foreign-invested enterprises can.

The practical advice is simple. Ask any agent you hire whether it is registered, and keep your own copy of everything it submits for you. A recap from Clark Hill also notes that foreign visitors staying in private homes can register online within 24 hours. That recap gives no effective date for the online option, so confirm it with the National Immigration Administration.

What the rules leave open

The published summaries leave several questions unanswered. They do not define what counts as a false statement, and they do not say how officials will decide between an honest error and deliberate fraud. They also do not say whether a ban applies from the date of the false statement or from the date officials find it. Until China publishes guidance, travellers should assume the strictest reading.

The rules also arrive at a time when many firms send engineers and buyers to China on short notice. Short-notice trips make mistakes more likely, because staff copy answers from old forms. A five-minute review by a second person can prevent a problem that lasts years. Plan early. Check twice. Keep records.

What travellers should do before booking

Take a hypothetical Brazilian project manager, Rafael, who plans a factory visit in Shenzhen. He should answer each question on his application exactly, attach matching invitation documents, and avoid sharing a pre-filled form he has not read. If he later spots an error, he should correct it before submitting rather than hoping nobody checks. Rafael is an illustration only.

Employers should brief staff in the same way. The DLA Piper note advises companies to check that visa applications and entry declarations are truthful, accurate and complete. It also advises companies in controlled-technology sectors to remind staff about export-control rules before they travel.

If you are comparing visa-friendly destinations, see how Asia’s rules differ in our report on Thailand’s visa exemption rules and our note on Japan’s renewal fees. You can also run a quick check with our visa eligibility checker.

China rules: your questions

When did the new rules start?

The Exit and Entry Administration Provisions took effect on 15 September 2026, after the State Council issued them on 31 July 2026.

How long can an entry ban last?

For false information or past border-related penalties, DLA Piper reports a ban of one to five years.

Do the rules also affect Chinese citizens?

Yes. They allow exit bans of six months to three years for certain fraud, border and national-security offences, plus exit bans for some export-control violations.

Must visa agents register?

Yes. New agencies register within 15 days, and existing ones within 90 days after the rules took effect.

What is the safest way to apply?

Give accurate, complete answers, attach consistent documents and use a registered intermediary if you hire one.

Sources

France’s Biggest Budget Cuts in Years Face a Revolt

French Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu is pushing ahead with France 2027 budget cuts worth 54 billion euros. A package he has called “almost unprecedented” as parliament opens a contentious debate this month that could decide whether his government survives into next year.

The plan, outlined on September 17 and sent to the Council of Ministers on October 1. Aims to stop France’s budget deficit from sliding further out of control. Without the cuts, Lecornu has warned, the 2027 deficit would approach 6.5% of GDP. Up from a 2026 shortfall that has already slipped to 5.4%. Above the government’s own 5% target.

Where the France 2027 budget cuts would land

The state would absorb the first round of savings. Local governments asked to slow their own spending growth. Pensioners face roughly 6 billion euros in combined savings. Lawmakers choosing between de-indexing pensions from inflation or scrapping a 10% tax allowance that retirees currently receive. Lecornu insists no pension payment will fall in absolute terms. He has not ruled out freezing the largest pensions or housing benefits.

France 2027 budget cuts illustration

Civil servants would see their pay index frozen. The labour ministry has been told to find 2.5 billion euros of its own. A surtax on large companies’ profits would be trimmed. Cutting its yield from close to 8 billion euros a year to about 5 billion. Separately, officials expect sick-leave reforms to save roughly 2 billion euros. Changes to mutually agreed job terminations to save 800 million euros annually. A new waiting period before some benefits reach foreign nationals is also part of the package.

A fragile government staring down a no-confidence vote

Lecornu has promised not to force the budget through by decree or bypass a full parliamentary vote. Provided opposition parties don’t obstruct the debate outright. That promise has not bought him comfort. The left-wing La France Insoumise has threatened a formal no-confidence motion. The Socialists have accused Lecornu of abandoning a promised compromise. The Communist Party has called the plan a “social breakdown.”

The far-right National Rally has signalled it may not join a censure motion. Lecornu has ruled out negotiating with a party he describes as his main political opponent. A nationwide civil-service strike, billed by union leader Sophie Binet as a “black day. ” took place in late September, underscoring how combustible the debate has already become.

Why the timing makes this harder

The budget fight is unfolding in the shadow of France’s 2027 presidential election. Lecornu has argued publicly that “waiting for the presidential race means choosing disorder.” Markets appear to share some of that unease. The gap between French and German government borrowing costs has widened sharply this year as investors price in the risk that Paris cannot pass a credible budget at all.

What comes next for France’s budget fight

Parliamentary debate opened in October and is expected to run for weeks. Lawmakers voting separately on the most contested measures. Including pension indexation, before a final vote on the full budget. A successful no-confidence motion at any point could collapse Lecornu’s government altogether. A scenario France has already lived through once this year.

Investors, French households and the European Central Bank will all be watching whether the 54 billion euros in savings survives the process intact. Is watered down in negotiation. Triggers the kind of political crisis that forces yet another change of prime minister before 2027.

More on global economic policy

France’s budget standoff is unfolding just as officials from around the world convene for thewider debate over sovereign debt and growthand amid continuing volatility covered in our report onthe EU’s trade talks with Beijing.

How France got here

France’s deficit problem did not appear overnight. The country has run persistent budget shortfalls for years. This year’s 5.4% figure already overshoots the government’s own 5% target. A pattern that has repeated across several recent budget cycles regardless of which coalition has held power. Rising debt-interest payments, projected to climb by about 10 billion euros. Add further pressure on top of underlying spending growth.

That history matters for how seriously investors take Lecornu’s current plan. A government that has repeatedly promised consolidation and repeatedly missed its own targets faces a credibility gap that a single. Even ambitious, budget proposal may not fully close. Helps explain why French borrowing costs have moved as much as they have this year.

Frequently Asked Questions

How big are France’s proposed 2027 budget cuts?

Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu’s plan targets 54 billion euros in savings. Spread across the state, local governments, pensions, civil service pay and corporate tax.

Will French pensions be cut?

Lecornu says no pension payment will fall in absolute terms. Lawmakers must choose between de-indexing pensions from inflation or removing a 10% tax allowance for retirees. He hasn’t ruled out freezing the largest pensions.

Could the French government fall over this budget?

It’s a real risk. La France Insoumise has threatened a no-confidence motion. France has already seen one government collapse over budget disputes this year.

When will the French parliament vote on the 2027 budget?

Debate opened in October 2026 and is expected to continue for weeks. Separate votes on sensitive measures before a final vote on the overall budget.

Why does this matter outside France?

Investors have pushed French borrowing costs sharply higher relative to Germany’s. A prolonged crisis could add pressure on the eurozone just as the European Central Bank weighs further rate moves.

Sources