AfD Wins Big in Germany — But Might Still Not Get to Govern

Germany’s far-right party just won a state election by a landslide. It still might not get to govern. The AfD Saxony-Anhalt election win on September 6 handed Alternative für Deutschland 43.8% of the vote. That is more than double the tally of Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s Christian Democrats.

Preliminary official results put the AfD far ahead of the incumbent CDU, which took just 17.2%. It is the strongest regional result the party has ever posted. It puts Germany within reach of something that has not happened since the Second World War: a state government led by a far-right party.

German flag flying near parliament after the AfD Saxony-Anhalt election win

Inside the AfD Saxony-Anhalt election win

Saxony-Anhalt sits in eastern Germany. The AfD has built its deepest support there over the past decade. Voters have consistently backed the party at higher rates than in the west. They cite economic anxiety, immigration concerns and a sense of being left behind by Berlin.

This result extends that trend into new territory. A vote share above 40% in a state election was, until Sunday, something the AfD had approached but never reached. Analysts see it as evidence the party’s support has hardened rather than plateaued.

Turnout figures released alongside the count showed strong participation across rural and urban districts. That undercuts any suggestion the result reflected a low-turnout protest vote rather than a genuine shift.

Why winning the most votes may not mean governing

Germany’s other major parties maintain what is known as a “firewall.” It is a standing refusal to form coalitions with the AfD at any level of government. That policy has held for a decade, even as the party’s vote share climbed steadily state after state.

Coalition math in Saxony-Anhalt now leaves the CDU, the Social Democrats and smaller parties searching for a majority without the AfD. The AfD holds the single largest bloc of seats. If the other parties succeed, the AfD would finish first in votes but sit outside government again, a pattern already seen in Thuringia and Saxony.

Whether that firewall survives another cycle is now an open question. Some CDU regional figures have publicly questioned whether excluding the largest party indefinitely is sustainable. National leadership insists the policy will not change.

What comes next on Germany’s election calendar

Saxony-Anhalt was not an isolated test. Mecklenburg-Vorpommern votes on September 20. Recent polling there shows the AfD leading with roughly 37% support, ahead of the Social Democrats at 23%. A second strong result within two weeks would harden the case that the party’s eastern strongholds are consolidating.

National attention is also turning to how Merz’s coalition in Berlin responds. A CDU that keeps losing eastern state contests by this margin faces pressure from within its own ranks. Party strategists are also watching whether the result changes turnout patterns ahead of any future federal contest.

What it means beyond Germany

The result adds to a broader pattern across Europe this year. Nationalist and right-wing parties have posted gains in regional and national contests alike. Germany’s political stability has long been treated as an anchor for the wider European Union. A sustained AfD surge complicates that assumption heading into further votes this autumn.

Investors and EU officials will also watch whether domestic political pressure changes Berlin’s posture on energy policy, defense spending and sanctions against Russia. All of those require coalition-level agreement to shift.

How the AfD’s rise has changed German politics

The AfD formed in 2013 as a euroskeptic party focused on economic policy. It has since shifted further right, building its platform around immigration restriction and national identity. That shift coincided with its growth from a fringe protest party into a serious electoral force across eastern Germany.

Mainstream parties have struggled to respond. Some analysts argue the firewall strategy has hardened AfD support by letting the party position itself as a permanent outsider. Others say abandoning the firewall would legitimize a party they view as a threat to democratic norms. Both camps agree the strategy faces its toughest test yet after Saxony-Anhalt.

Frequently asked questions

What was the AfD Saxony-Anhalt election win margin?
The AfD took 43.8% of the vote. That is more than double the 17.2% won by the incumbent Christian Democrats, according to preliminary official results.

Will the AfD govern Saxony-Anhalt?
It is not yet clear. Other parties have historically refused to form coalitions with the AfD, so a government excluding the largest vote-getter remains possible.

Has the AfD ever led a German state government?
No. No far-right party has led a German state government since the Second World War. This result does not guarantee that changes now.

What election is next?
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern votes on September 20. Polling shows the AfD ahead there too.

Does this affect the national government?
Not directly. Repeated losses of this size put pressure on the national CDU-led coalition in Berlin.

For more on the political pressures reshaping Germany’s response to security threats, see our coverage of the Russia consulate closure, and for the wider European electoral picture, our report on Sweden’s tightening election race.

Sources

  • CBS News — AfD wins big in German regional election, falls short of bid to lead a state. cbsnews.com
  • Al Jazeera — German far-right AfD wins Saxony-Anhalt election, falls short of majority. aljazeera.com
  • NPR — German exit polls suggest far-right party has big lead in regional election. npr.org

Miami Airport Plane Crash Halts Flights, Kills Five

A Boeing 767 cargo plane overran a runway at Miami International Airport on September 6. The crash killed five people and ground the airport to a halt. The Miami airport plane crash triggered a full ground stop, diverted dozens of inbound flights, and left one of the busiest hubs in the United States digging out from a disruption still felt today.

The aircraft was an Amazon Prime Air freighter operated by 21 Air. It arrived from San Juan, Puerto Rico, and overran the diagonal runway at roughly 2 p.m. local time. It struck ground vehicles and caught fire. Five people died. It injured five more, three critically. More than 60 emergency response units responded to the scene.

Miami airport plane crash emergency response on the runway

What happened during the Miami airport plane crash

Flight 7598 landed and failed to stop before the end of the runway. The Federal Aviation Administration ordered a ground stop across the entire airport. All runways and taxiways closed at once. Airport officials confirmed the closure on social media within the hour. They warned passengers already inside the terminal to expect long waits.

One runway reopened around 4:15 p.m. A second followed roughly 30 minutes later. Even so, the damage to the day’s schedule was done. Controllers diverted nearly 84 of the airport’s 100 inbound flights elsewhere. By evening, Miami ranked as the most disrupted airport in the country. Airlines cancelled 13% of flights and delayed 36% more.

Emergency crews worked through the afternoon to clear wreckage from the runway safety area. Fire crews needed roughly 20 minutes to fully extinguish the blaze. The affected runway stayed closed well past the evening rush.

Why a single runway overrun caused nationwide delays

Miami International is a major connecting point for flights between the United States, Latin America and the Caribbean. When one of its four runways goes out of service, the effect reaches airports that had nothing to do with the crash. Aircraft due to depart Miami were held at their origin. Crews ran out of duty hours. Connecting passengers missed onward flights booked on separate tickets.

This pattern has repeated at other airports this year. A single incident at one facility can cascade into delays across an entire regional network within hours. Modern airline schedules depend on aircraft and crews cycling through several airports in a single day. A morning delay in one city becomes an evening cancellation somewhere else.

American Airlines and LATAM both use Miami as a hub for connections into South America. Passengers on those routes felt the disruption most directly. Airlines rebooked some passengers onto flights a full day later.

What investigators are looking at next

The National Transportation Safety Board typically leads investigations into fatal runway accidents at US airports. Investigators examine flight data recorders, maintenance logs and air traffic control communications. They have not yet said what caused the aircraft to run past the end of the runway. Officials have cautioned that a full account will take time.

Cargo freighter accidents draw particular scrutiny. These aircraft often fly older airframes on tight overnight schedules. Investigators will likely examine the plane’s maintenance history and the weather conditions at the time of landing. They will also check whether the crew reported any mechanical issue before touchdown.

Airport operators said they were working with federal investigators and airlines to restore a normal schedule. Officials expected some residual delays to continue into the following day.

What happens next for travelers

Passengers with bookings through Miami in the days after the crash should check flight status directly with their airline. Diverted aircraft and displaced crews typically take a full operational day to reposition. Knock-on delays are common even after runways reopen.

Travelers connecting through Miami on international itineraries should build in extra buffer time. Anyone with a tight connection should contact their airline about rebooking options rather than risk a missed departure. Passengers flying cargo-heavy routes to and from the Caribbean may also see schedule changes as carriers reroute freight around the affected runway.

Frequently asked questions

How many people died in the Miami airport plane crash?
The crash killed five people. It injured five others, three critically, when the aircraft overran the runway and caught fire.

Was this a passenger flight?
No. The aircraft was an Amazon Prime Air-branded cargo freighter operated by 21 Air. It was arriving from San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Is Miami International Airport still closed?
No. Two of the airport’s four runways reopened within a few hours. Delays and cancellations continued afterward as schedules recovered.

What caused the crash?
Investigators have not yet released a cause. Investigators expect the full inquiry into the runway overrun to take weeks or months.

Will this affect flights booked for next week?
Most schedules should return to normal within a day or two. Travelers on tight connections through Miami should still confirm status with their airline before departure.

For more on how a single incident can disrupt air travel across an entire region, see our coverage of the Labor Day weekend flight disruptions and the chain reaction across European airports earlier this month.

Sources

  • Miami International Airport — Official statement on Flight 7598. x.com/iflymia
  • Airways Magazine — Amazon Prime Air Boeing 767 overruns Miami runway. airwaysmag.com
  • Local10/NBC Miami — Passengers dealing with delays following fatal plane crash. local10.com

17 Million Flew This Weekend — Thousands Didn’t Land on Time

An estimated 17.4 million passengers began Labor Day weekend travel between September 3 and 8. Severe weather across the Midwest and Northeast turned that volume into widespread delays. The Labor Day flight disruptions forced the FAA to stop or slow flights at six major Northeast airports, according to The Travel.

Where the Labor Day flight disruptions hit hardest

Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport absorbed the heaviest damage. It saw 41 canceled departures and 38 canceled arrivals. The airport delayed nearly half of its remaining flights: 230 departures and 281 arrivals. Chicago O’Hare faced ground stops for a second consecutive day. The Travel separately reported that about 1.4 million passengers planned to fly through the weekend.

Labor Day flight disruptions
Record holiday travel volume left little room for error once severe storms began moving through major hubs.

What triggered the weather-driven wave

Thunderstorms centered on Chicago and the Northeast disrupted some of the country’s busiest airports on Friday, September 4. That was just as the holiday travel surge began. The National Weather Service warned the storms would shift south. Forecasters expected them to cross the Midwest, the Mid-Atlantic, and the Southeast over the following days. The disruption risk did not end with the initial Friday storms. It simply moved geographically as the weekend went on.

Why American Airlines saw the biggest impact

American Airlines recorded the highest disruption levels of any carrier worldwide. It was operating flights for an expected 3.5 million passengers between September 3 and 8. The FAA classified the disruptions as weather-related, not an airline operational failure. That distinction matters directly to travelers. Airlines do not have to cover meals or hotels for stranded passengers when weather causes the delay.

The scale problem behind the numbers

Labor Day weekend is already one of the busiest travel periods of the year in the US. Even a moderate storm system arrives on top of a system running near capacity. High passenger volume is one factor. A shifting severe-weather pattern lasting several days, rather than a single afternoon, is the other. Together, they pushed this year’s disruption total well beyond a routine bad-weather day.

Airport operations staff say recovery from a multi-day disruption like this one takes time. It typically adds an extra 24 to 48 hours after the weather clears. Crews and aircraft need that window to get repositioned to where they are scheduled next.

What flyers can expect through the weekend

Forecasters expect storms to keep moving south and east through the Labor Day period. Airports in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast should brace for delays like those the Northeast and Midwest saw earlier in the week. Travelers with connections through Reagan National, O’Hare, or other affected hubs should check flight status before heading to the airport. The FAA has reissued ground stops on back-to-back days during this stretch. They have not resolved after a single storm cycle, the way a routine weather event usually does.

How this holiday weekend compares

Labor Day disruptions happen most years to some degree. What sets 2026 apart is the combination of factors. Record passenger volume met a multi-day storm track, rather than a single afternoon event. That combination makes recovery slower. Airlines cannot simply wait out one storm cell before operations return to normal.

Rebooking demand rises fast during a disruption this size. Call centers and airport counters typically see the heaviest load in the 24 hours right after a ground stop lifts. Runway and gate capacity tend to be the harder constraint to fix quickly, more so than staffing alone. That is why officials expect some residual delays even after the weather itself clears.

Passengers rebooked onto later flights often face a second wave of tight connections once they do get moving again, since the network rarely clears evenly across every hub at once.

Travelers heading out over the remaining holiday days should keep an eye on their airline’s app rather than relying on airport departure boards alone. Push notifications tend to reach passengers with gate and cancellation changes well before the physical signage updates.

By the time the holiday weekend ends, airlines and the FAA will have a clearer picture of the true cost. That figure, in canceled flights and rebooking fees, typically takes a few more days to add up in full.

For most travelers, though, the number that matters is simpler: did they make it home on time. This year, for a large share of Labor Day flyers, the honest answer was no.

Questions worth asking

How many passengers were flying over Labor Day weekend 2026?

An estimated 17.4 million passengers were expected to travel between September 3 and 8, according to The Travel.

Which airport had the most cancellations?

Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport had the heaviest impact, with 41 canceled departures and 38 canceled arrivals.

What caused the Labor Day flight disruptions?

Severe thunderstorms centered on Chicago and the Northeast disrupted major airports beginning September 4, with storms expected to shift south through the weekend.

Will airlines compensate passengers for weather delays?

Airlines are not legally required to provide meals or hotel costs for weather-related delays, unlike disruptions classified as within an airline’s control.

Which airline had the most disruptions?

American Airlines recorded the highest disruption levels worldwide while flying an expected 3.5 million passengers over the holiday period.

Sources

  • The Travel — FAA Stops Flights At 6 Major Northeast Airports. thetravel.com
  • The Travel — FAA Grounds Chicago O’Hare Airport Flights For A Second Day. thetravel.com

Related coverage on Tamara News: how a government shutdown could affect air travel and flight disruptions in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.

One Bad Day in Berlin Rippled Across a Dozen European Airports

A single bad day at Berlin’s main airport helped trigger a continent-wide ripple of delays on September 3. It was part of a broader wave of European airport flight disruptions that hit 12 major hubs across nine countries. Roughly 2,141 flight delays and 113 cancellations were recorded that day, according to The Traveler.

Which airports were hit hardest

Berlin Brandenburg emerged as one of the worst-affected hubs. It logged 127 delays and 28 cancellations in a single day. London Gatwick reported 239 delays on its own, the highest single-airport delay count in the wave. The affected network also included Rome Fiumicino, Amsterdam Schiphol, London Heathrow, Frankfurt, Brussels, Madrid Barajas, Barcelona El Prat, Dublin, Oslo and Paris Charles de Gaulle. The impact spread well beyond any single country’s air traffic control system.

European airport flight disruptions
Delays at one major hub can cascade across the entire European air travel network within hours.

What actually caused the European airport flight disruptions

Two separate problems combined to produce this scale of disruption. Severe convective weather across parts of the continent in late August generated more than 200,000 minutes of en-route delay in a single day. That backlog took time to clear even after the storms passed. On top of that, a security incident and rescreening operation hit Berlin Brandenburg’s Terminal 1 on September 3. It created its own knock-on delays. Those delays spread across the European network, because aircraft and crews scheduled to fly onward from Berlin got held up first.

Strikes are adding a second layer of risk

Weather and one-off security incidents are not the only threats to European air travel this month. Italy has scheduled aviation strikes, including security action at Rome’s airport on September 13. A nationwide ENAV air traffic control action follows on September 30. Ground handling staff at Barcelona-El Prat have also been on an indefinite strike. That adds a layer of planned labor disruption on top of whatever weather or operational problems arise day to day.

What travelers should expect this week

Airlines flying through the 12 affected hubs have advised passengers to build in extra buffer time. That matters most for connecting travel. A cruise departure, a guided tour, or a long-distance rail booking will not wait for a delayed arrival. Runway maintenance and taxiway repair projects at several large airports have also narrowed the system’s margin for error this year. Even a moderate weather event or staffing issue can now cascade further than it might have in a less constrained network.

Travel insurers are also fielding more claims tied to missed connections this month. Brokers say the trend tracks closely with how often multi-airport disruption days like September 3 occur.

Why this keeps happening in 2026

This is not an isolated event. European air travel has absorbed a string of shocks this year: labor disputes, aging infrastructure projects, and weather events arriving more often than in past summers. Any one of these alone would be manageable. Together, they leave almost no slack in the system.

Airport operators have started warning airlines and passengers to expect more days like September 3 before the year ends. Investment in additional staffing and equipment takes years to show results. Until it does, a single bad morning at one hub will keep rippling across the wider network.

Better sharing of real-time capacity data between hubs could help catch a developing bottleneck earlier, industry analysts say, before it cascades into a multi-country delay wave like the one on September 3. Any such fix would take time to build and would not help this month’s travelers.

Passengers booking through the affected hubs in the weeks ahead should treat a tight connection as a real risk, not a remote one. An extra hour or two between flights costs little. Missing an onward connection during a disruption this size can cost a full extra day of travel.

For anyone flying through the region in the next week or two, checking an airline’s app for real-time gate and delay updates remains the most reliable option. Physical departure boards can lag behind the app data by several minutes during the busiest disruption windows.

The lesson from September 3 is a simple one. A single hub having a bad morning is no longer a local problem. It is a European problem, at least until the network builds in enough spare capacity to absorb one.

What travelers are asking

How many flights were affected by the European airport flight disruptions?

Roughly 2,141 delays and 113 cancellations were recorded across 12 major airports on September 3, according to The Traveler.

Which airport was hit hardest?

Berlin Brandenburg logged 127 delays and 28 cancellations, while London Gatwick reported 239 delays, the highest single-airport count.

What caused the disruption?

A combination of lingering weather-related backlog from late August storms and a security incident at Berlin Brandenburg’s Terminal 1 on September 3.

Are strikes adding to the disruption?

Yes. Italy has aviation strikes scheduled for September 13 and September 30, and ground handling staff at Barcelona-El Prat have been striking indefinitely.

Which airports were part of the affected network?

Rome Fiumicino, Amsterdam Schiphol, London Heathrow and Gatwick, Berlin Brandenburg, Frankfurt, Brussels, Madrid Barajas, Barcelona El Prat, Dublin, Oslo and Paris Charles de Gaulle.

Sources

  • The Traveler — European Aviation Crisis 2026 Snarls 2,141 Flights at Key Hubs. thetraveler.org
  • Travel And Tour World — European Airports Including Barcelona and 11 Others Cancel and Delay Flights. travelandtourworld.com

Related coverage on Tamara News: extended Schengen border checks and the delayed ETIAS launch.

Two Drones Triggered a New Round of Airstrikes in Lebanon

The Israeli military struck southern Lebanon again on Sunday, September 6. Hezbollah had launched drones at Israeli soldiers stationed in the border security zone. The Israel strikes southern Lebanon operation killed four people and wounded at least 20 others, according to Lebanon’s Health Ministry, cited by Haaretz.

What triggered the strikes

The Israeli military said Hezbollah launched two drones toward its soldiers inside the security zone. No Israeli soldiers were hurt in that attack. Israel called the drone launch “a blatant violation.” It responded with strikes across several areas, including the town of Arab Salim. Residents there had already received evacuation warnings.

Israel strikes southern Lebanon
Southern Lebanon has seen repeated rounds of strikes despite a standing ceasefire framework.

Israeli warplanes also hit areas around Upper Nabatieh and the outskirts of Kfar Roummane. RTÉ reported the details. The Israeli military said the targeted buildings had links to Hezbollah activity, though it gave few specifics.

How this fits the current ceasefire arrangement

Israel and Hezbollah have operated under a US-mediated ceasefire for months. Both sides have accused each other of violations on a rolling basis throughout that period. Sunday’s exchange stands out. A drone launch from Hezbollah was followed within hours by lethal Israeli airstrikes. That is a sharper pattern than the smaller, contained incidents that have defined most of the ceasefire period.

France 24 separately reported that Lebanese sources put the recent death toll from Israeli strikes in the south at 13. That figure spans a broader window than Sunday’s operation alone. It shows how fluid casualty counts remain as reports arrive from multiple locations at once.

What civilians in the affected areas face

Residents of Arab Salim and nearby villages got Israeli evacuation warnings before the strikes hit. The Israeli military has used this pattern repeatedly in southern Lebanon operations. Warnings reduce casualties, but they do not eliminate them. Some residents cannot leave quickly. Others are unwilling to abandon homes and property on short notice.

What could happen next

Watch whether Hezbollah responds with more drone or rocket fire. That would test whether the broader ceasefire framework survives this exchange or unravels further. US mediators brokered the original ceasefire, and they have a direct interest in preventing a full return to open conflict. Diplomatic pressure on both sides typically intensifies within days of an incident this serious.

Lebanese officials will also face pressure to show they can restrain Hezbollah’s actions near the border, a demand Israel has repeated after nearly every recent incident in the security zone.

The ceasefire’s rocky history

The current Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire has never been fully quiet. Both sides have logged complaints against the other almost every month since it took effect. Most incidents involved small-scale fire that drew limited responses. Sunday’s exchange broke that pattern. A drone launch drew an immediate, lethal air campaign rather than a contained reply.

Lebanese officials have said before that they lack full control over Hezbollah’s actions near the border. Israeli officials counter that Lebanon’s government bears responsibility regardless. That disagreement has never been resolved, and it resurfaces after nearly every incident like this one.

Southern Lebanon’s residents live with that unresolved dispute day to day. Evacuation warnings like Sunday’s have become a recurring feature of life near the security zone. Each new round of strikes adds pressure on families deciding whether returning home is worth the risk.

US mediators face a narrow path here. Push Israel too hard and risk looking weak on security guarantees it has offered in the past. Push too little and risk watching the ceasefire erode incident by incident until it is a ceasefire in name only.

Hezbollah, for its part, faces its own balancing act. It answers to a domestic audience that expects a response to Israeli strikes, while also operating under a Lebanese government that wants to avoid a full return to war. That tension shapes how measured or aggressive its next move is likely to be.

Neither side has framed Sunday’s exchange as a turning point so far. History in this conflict suggests that framing can shift quickly if either side reads the other’s next move as an escalation rather than a one-off response.

For residents in the border villages, the label diplomats choose matters less than whether the strikes stop. That distinction, between a policy debate in distant capitals and daily life under threat, is easy to lose in coverage of any single incident.

Common questions

What started the September 6 strikes in southern Lebanon?

Hezbollah launched two drones at Israeli soldiers in the border security zone. Israel responded with airstrikes across several areas of southern Lebanon.

How many people were killed or wounded?

Lebanon’s Health Ministry reported four people killed and at least 20 wounded in the strikes, according to Haaretz.

Is there still a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah?

A US-mediated ceasefire has held for months. Both sides have repeatedly accused each other of violations, and incidents like this one test whether it holds.

Did Israel warn residents before striking?

Yes. The Israeli military issued evacuation warnings for areas including Arab Salim ahead of the strikes.

Where exactly did the strikes hit?

Reported strike areas include Arab Salim, Upper Nabatieh and the outskirts of Kfar Roummane in southern Lebanon.

Sources

  • Haaretz — IDF says it struck southern Lebanon after Hezbollah launched explosive drones. haaretz.com
  • RTÉ — Israel launches fresh strikes on southern Lebanon. rte.ie

Related coverage on Tamara News: the Strait of Hormuz tanker attack and Russia’s latest strikes on Kyiv.