• Mon - Fri 9.00 - 19.00
Open

Author Archives: Francisca Samuel

Tamara's World  /  Articles by: Francisca Samuel

Author: Francisca Samuel

Francisca Samuel is an editor at Tamara News, where she covers immigration, travel, business and technology news for readers across Africa and the Gulf.

13 Oct 2026
Quebec skyline representing the province behind the Quebec PSTQ permanent selection invitations

Quebec Just Invited 519 More Workers for Permanent Residence

Categories Canada, Immigration

Quebec issued 519 invitations across its Programme de selection des travailleurs qualifies (PSTQ) in its ninth selection round of the year, the province’s Ministry of Immigration confirmed. The Quebec PSTQ permanent selection round split invitations across four separate streams, each targeting a different category of skilled worker already living and working in the province.

Stream 2, covering intermediate and manual-skill occupations, took the largest share with 316 invitations, including 254 issued to candidates in TEER 4 or 5 occupations holding a qualifying diploma. Stream 3, for regulated professions, issued 110 invitations, with healthcare, education and social-services occupations accounting for 69 of them. Stream 1, for highly qualified and specialized workers, issued 86 invitations, and Stream 4, reserved for exceptional talent, issued just 7.

How Quebec’s PSTQ permanent selection scoring works

Each stream carries its own eligibility bar and cutoff score. Stream 1 requires at least 12 months of recent Quebec work experience in a TEER 0–2 occupation, with cutoffs in this round ranging from 634 to 706 depending on the specific exercise. Stream 2 requires 24 months of recent experience in a TEER 3–5 occupation, with cutoffs between 611 and 706. Stream 3 targets residents intending to work in a regulated profession, with a much wider cutoff range of 380 to 697 depending on the occupation’s priority status. Stream 4 requires 36 months of experience plus either a positive opinion letter from a government partner organization or an exceptional achievement paired with a doctorate.

Candidate profiles were pulled from Quebec’s Arrima declaration-of-interest pool on September 21 for Streams 1 through 3, and September 24 for Stream 4, with invitations formally issued shortly after.

Skilled tradesperson at work, the kind of candidate targeted by Quebec PSTQ permanent selection

Why invitation volumes are shifting right now

Quebec reopened its Quebec Experience Program (PEQ) on July 2, and the province is scaling back PSTQ invitations while that first PEQ intake window remains open through October 31 — mainly affecting TEER 4–5 occupations and candidates with under two years of experience, the exact profile PEQ is designed to capture instead. From November 2026 onward, Quebec plans to balance invitation volumes between the two programs directly, with a stated goal of issuing roughly equal numbers of Quebec Selection Certificates (CSQs) through PSTQ and PEQ by 2029.

That rebalancing explains why this round’s largest stream, Stream 2, is precisely the category PEQ is designed to serve — invitation numbers there are likely to keep shifting as the two programs settle into their new balance over the coming months.

What a Quebec PSTQ permanent selection invitation actually gets you

An invitation is not the same as approval. Invited candidates must still submit a complete application for a Quebec Selection Certificate, and only once that CSQ is issued can they apply to the federal government for permanent residence with the stated intent to settle in Quebec. Candidates already living in Canada who file their PR application afterward may become eligible for a bridging open work permit while the federal decision is pending, provided they maintain their status in the interim.

Quebec’s PSTQ functions as the province’s primary economic immigration pathway, distinct from the federal Express Entry system that governs most other provinces, which is why candidates aiming to settle specifically in Quebec need to track Arrima invitation rounds separately from federal draws.

What happens after this draw

Candidates who received an invitation in this round typically have a set window to submit their complete CSQ application, after which Quebec’s immigration ministry processes applications roughly in the order received, subject to standard document and eligibility checks. Given the PEQ-PSTQ rebalancing already underway, candidates who were not invited this round in TEER 4–5 occupations may find better odds applying through the newly reopened PEQ intake instead, at least until that window closes on October 31.

Watch for Quebec’s November invitation round, which the province has said will reflect the first phase of its planned long-term rebalancing between the two main economic pathways.

What people are asking about this draw

How many people were invited this round?
519 candidates across four PSTQ streams, with Stream 2 (intermediate and manual-skill occupations) taking the largest share at 316 invitations.

What’s the difference between PSTQ and Express Entry?
PSTQ is Quebec’s own economic immigration pathway; Express Entry is the federal system used by other Canadian provinces. Quebec manages its selection separately.

Why are PSTQ invitation numbers changing?
Quebec reopened its Quebec Experience Program on July 2 and is scaling back PSTQ invitations in overlapping categories while that intake window runs through October 31.

What cutoff score did this round require?
Cutoffs varied by stream and exercise, ranging from as low as 380 in parts of Stream 3 to as high as 706 in parts of Streams 1 and 2.

Does an invitation guarantee permanent residence?
No. Invited candidates must still apply for and receive a Quebec Selection Certificate before applying to the federal government for permanent residence.

Can I get a work permit while my application is processed?
Candidates already in Canada may be eligible for a bridging open work permit once they file their federal PR application, provided they maintain their status.

Sources

  • CIC News — Quebec invites 519 workers to apply for permanent selection through PSTQ. cicnews.com
  • Gouvernement du Quebec — Immigration permanente: un nombre important d’invitations transmises pour repondre aux besoins du Quebec. quebec.ca

For related coverage, see our reports on Canada’s September Express Entry round and the work permit freeze affecting six Canadian regions.

13 Oct 2026
Himalayan trekking trail near where Nepal floods foreign trekkers were stranded in Gorkha

A Landslide Blocked a River in Nepal — Now 100+ Trekkers Are Cut Off

Categories World

The Nepal floods foreign trekkers encountered this week trace back to a predawn landslide that blocked the Budhi Gandaki River in Nepal’s Gorkha district on Sunday, triggering flash floods that stranded more than 100 hikers along the popular Manaslu trekking trail, according to Bhuwan Raj Ojha of the Manaslu Conservation Area Project. Part of the trail itself was swept away, cutting off access for hikers moving through different sections of the route roughly 100 kilometres (62 miles) west of Kathmandu.

The only group whose nationality has been specifically identified so far is nine Bangladeshi trekkers waiting in Jagat village for a possible helicopter evacuation, according to fellow trekker Md Shahadat Hossain, who said the group remains safe but has had no electricity since the flooding began.

How Nepal floods foreign trekkers along the Manaslu trail

The floods washed away bridges and hiking trails and damaged or destroyed more than 200 homes in the district. Three hydroelectric plants were also damaged, cutting power and communications to Jagat village and leaving food supplies there running low. Nepal’s disaster authorities have issued flood alerts for Gorkha and four downstream districts — Tanahun, Chitwan, East Nawalparasi and West Nawalparasi — as water levels moved through the river system.

Five villagers remain out of contact as of the latest update, though officials have reported no deaths from this specific flood event, a notably better outcome than the catastrophic glacier-collapse flood that struck a different Nepal river system in August and killed more than 1,450 people with thousands still missing.

Flooded river scene from the Nepal floods foreign trekkers were caught up in near the Budhi Gandaki

Rescue operations underway

Nepal’s army rescued 321 people on Monday, October 13, including 12 foreign nationals, and said the operation would continue into Tuesday even as the river’s water level began to drop. Gorkha district authorities have asked villagers living along the riverbank downstream to evacuate as a precaution while the situation stabilizes.

Ojha, from the Manaslu Conservation Area Project, said trekkers who want to leave the area “need to be rescued,” while those willing to continue their trek “can do so from locations that are safe,” adding that tea houses along the route have not been affected and remain safe for travelers to shelter in. Hossain, the Bangladeshi trekker, echoed that assessment for his own group: “We are safe, but there has been no electricity since yesterday.”

Why this flood draws extra scrutiny

Nepal is still recovering from August’s catastrophic flood, caused by a glacier collapsing into a different river valley near the Nepal-Tibet border, which killed more than 1,450 people and left thousands missing across both the Nepali and Tibetan sides of the border. That disaster has made Nepali authorities and the international trekking community considerably more alert to flood risk in mountain river valleys generally, which likely explains the relatively fast army response — 321 people rescued within roughly 24 hours of this smaller, separate incident.

The Manaslu trail is one of Nepal’s most popular restricted-area trekking routes, drawing thousands of foreign visitors annually who pay for a special permit to trek around the eighth-highest mountain in the world. A prolonged closure would have knock-on effects for trekking operators and guides who depend on the October-November season, one of the two main trekking windows in the Nepali Himalaya.

What rescue teams are doing next

The Nepali army says rescue operations will continue beyond Monday as water levels permit safer access to stranded groups in harder-to-reach sections of the trail. Travelers currently on or planning to join the Manaslu circuit should check conditions directly with Nepal’s Department of Tourism or their trekking agency before departure, since trail damage in a landslide-prone valley can take weeks to fully repair even after floodwaters recede.

Downstream communities in Tanahun, Chitwan and the two Nawalparasi districts remain under flood alert, meaning the practical risk from this event is not yet fully resolved even though the immediate trekker rescue appears largely complete.

Nepal’s tourism board has not yet issued guidance on whether permit holders due to start the Manaslu circuit in the coming days should delay their trips, leaving that call in the hands of individual trekking agencies for now. Operators with experience in the region say a short delay of several days is the more common outcome after this kind of landslide-triggered flood, rather than a season-long closure, since the damage is concentrated on specific bridge crossings rather than the trail’s higher, more remote sections.

Questions about the Gorkha floods

How many trekkers were stranded?
More than 100 foreign trekkers were stranded across different points on the Manaslu trail, according to local conservation area officials.

What caused the flooding?
A predawn landslide on October 12 blocked the Budhi Gandaki River, triggering flash floods downstream.

Were there any deaths?
No deaths have been reported from this specific flood event as of the latest update.

How many people have been rescued?
Nepal’s army rescued 321 people on October 13, including 12 foreign nationals, with operations continuing.

Is this related to August’s deadly Nepal flood?
No, it is a separate incident in a different river valley, though it follows the catastrophic August glacier-collapse flood that killed more than 1,450 people elsewhere in Nepal.

Are the Manaslu trail’s tea houses safe?
Yes, according to a local conservation official, tea houses along the route have not been affected and remain safe for trekkers to use.

Sources

  • Al Jazeera — More than 100 foreign trekkers stranded by floods in Nepal’s Gorkha region. aljazeera.com
  • The Japan Times — More than 100 foreign trekkers stranded in flood-hit region of Nepal, official says. japantimes.co.jp

For related coverage, see our reports on Nepal’s August flood death toll and the earlier Himalayan flash floods disaster.

13 Oct 2026
Connected smart home devices of the kind flagged in the self-replicating AI devices warning

Your Smart Fridge Could Be Running AI Within Months

Categories Tech

Researchers at Anthropic say self-replicating AI devices could become possible within months, as small AI models approach the point where they can copy themselves across internet-connected household gadgets — smart TVs, fridges, ovens, even robotic lawnmowers — without needing a data centre at all. The warning comes from a report released Monday by Anthropic’s frontier red team, which ran experiments across multiple AI models developed in both the US and China.

Researchers William Zhou and Daniel Freeman, who worked on the report, described a scenario in which such a model could spread like a worm across consumer Internet of Things (IoT) devices. Because there would be no single centralized host running the model, the researchers said this kind of spread would be “challenging to shut down” using conventional methods that assume you can simply unplug or patch one machine.

Why self-replicating AI devices target homes, not data centres

Large data centres remain what the researchers call “a clear, high-value target” for security teams, and they are generally well defended. Household and small-business IoT devices are different: they are internet-connected but have historically had minimal built-in security, making them an easier foothold even though each individual device offers far less computing power than a server rack.

In Anthropic’s current testing, no existing model could reliably self-replicate onto a smart TV. But the researchers said the trajectory of AI capability improvement makes a model capable of doing so likely by the end of 2026 — a timeline measured in months, not years, from when the report was published.

Artificial intelligence concept illustrating the risk behind self-replicating AI devices

What “awash with agents” actually means

The report frames this as part of a broader future the researchers expect: a world “awash with agents,” some of which will not be under direct human control. That framing matters because it shifts the conversation from a single dramatic breakout scenario toward a slower, more diffuse risk — AI systems quietly persisting and spreading across ordinary consumer hardware that nobody thinks to monitor for this kind of activity.

Independent AI safety researcher Roman Yampolskiy, who was not involved in the report, called the findings significant while cautioning against overstatement. “Today, this is not an existential threat,” he said, though he described the underlying trend as concerning. Anthropic did not respond to questions from Al Jazeera about the broader safety implications of its own findings.

The policy gap this exposes

Anthropic and OpenAI have both previously called for coordinated slowdowns in frontier AI development, proposals that have found little real buy-in from either the United States or China, the two countries whose AI labs are advancing fastest. Anthropic and several other major US AI firms have also joined a non-binding accord on self-policing AI development — an agreement that outside experts have criticized as voluntary and therefore difficult to enforce if a lab’s competitive incentives point the other way.

That gap between the risk Anthropic’s own researchers are flagging and the lack of binding international rules is likely to be the sharpest point of criticism the report draws, since it is effectively a company warning about risks its own industry has resisted being regulated against.

Where AI safety goes from here

Expect device manufacturers and smart-home platform operators to face pressure to harden firmware update practices and network segmentation on consumer IoT products well before any model capable of self-replication actually exists in the wild — a classic case of security researchers trying to get ahead of a threat rather than reacting to one already in use. Regulators in the EU, which has moved fastest on binding AI rules, are likely to cite this kind of research as justification for extending obligations to hardware and device makers, not just AI model developers.

For ordinary consumers, the practical takeaway for now is unglamorous: keeping smart-device firmware updated and avoiding devices from manufacturers with poor security track records remains the most effective defence, exactly as it was before this report, even if the specific threat it describes is still months away by Anthropic’s own estimate.

AI self-replication: the basics

What exactly is Anthropic warning about?
That small AI models may soon be capable of copying themselves across internet-connected home devices like smart TVs and fridges, without needing a data centre.

How soon could this happen?
Anthropic’s researchers say the current trend in AI capability makes such a model likely by the end of 2026, though no existing model can do this reliably today.

Why are home devices more vulnerable than data centres?
Data centres are high-value targets that are generally well defended, while household IoT devices are internet-connected but have historically had minimal security.

Is this an existential threat right now?
Independent researcher Roman Yampolskiy said no, calling it “not an existential threat” today while describing the trend as concerning.

What is Anthropic doing about the risk it describes?
Anthropic has joined a non-binding industry accord on self-policing AI development, though experts call it hard to enforce.

What can consumers do to protect their devices?
Keep smart-device firmware updated and be cautious about products from manufacturers with weak security track records.

Sources

  • Al Jazeera — AI could self-replicate on home devices within ‘months’, Anthropic says. aljazeera.com
  • Gulf News — AI could soon copy itself across smart TVs, home devices, Anthropic warns. gulfnews.com

For related coverage, see our reports on an AI agent’s false murder tip to Philadelphia police and the EU’s new AI Act enforcement powers.

13 Oct 2026
Data center server racks of the kind the Microsoft Maia 300 chip will power

Microsoft’s New AI Chip Claims 7x the Speed of Its Last One

Categories Tech

Microsoft has unveiled the Microsoft Maia 300 chip, its third-generation in-house AI accelerator, as part of a custom-silicon programme the company says will become its primary inference hardware starting in 2027. Microsoft claims the new chip delivers up to seven times the token throughput per rack compared with its predecessor, Maia 200, in matched 96-accelerator configurations.

The chip is built around eight HBM4 memory stacks delivering 18 terabytes per second of bandwidth, with a thermal design power of 950 watts — about 200 watts more than Maia 200. It uses a chiplet design, with compute dies manufactured by TSMC on its advanced N2P process, paired with separate memory-controller and input/output chiplets.

What the Microsoft Maia 300 chip changes at the rack level

A full production rack holds 96 Maia 300 accelerators and draws about 167 kilowatts of power, aggregating to 27.6 terabytes of HBM capacity and 1.7 petabytes per second of combined memory bandwidth across the rack. Microsoft says the chip supports low-precision number formats, including an enhanced version of MXFP4, which reduces the memory needed for the “key-value cache” that large language models rely on during inference — a detail that matters because memory bandwidth, not raw compute, is increasingly the bottleneck in large-scale AI inference systems.

Scale-up communication between racks uses Microsoft’s own Ethernet-based AI transport protocol, which the company says can span anywhere from a single rack to an entire data centre, a design choice aimed at avoiding reliance on proprietary interconnects from chip suppliers.

Silicon wafer manufacturing process behind chips like the Microsoft Maia 300 chip

How it compares with Maia 200

Maia 200, the current-generation chip now in production, is built on TSMC’s 3-nanometer process with 216GB of HBM3e memory and 7 terabytes per second of bandwidth, running at 750 watts. It already powers Microsoft Copilot and supports model development inside Microsoft’s MAI research team, and is rolling out across the US, Europe and Australia. Microsoft says Maia 200 delivers up to 1.7 times more tokens per watt than comparable GPU infrastructure for workloads including Teams, Copilot and Cowork AI features. GitHub Copilot and Microsoft Foundry support are both expected to go live on Maia 200 before the end of 2026.

Maia 300 is positioned as the next step up rather than a replacement arriving immediately — production rollout is scheduled for 2027, when Microsoft says the Maia family will scale to “multi-gigawatt deployments” and become the company’s primary inference hardware going forward.

The bigger picture: cutting dependence on external GPU suppliers

Microsoft’s push into custom silicon mirrors moves by Google, Amazon and Meta, all of which have built their own AI accelerators partly to reduce dependence on externally sourced GPUs amid years of tight supply and high prices. Microsoft has reportedly discussed securing roughly 300,000 Maia 300 units for 2027 delivery as part of scaling the programme, and the company’s own framing emphasizes efficient data movement — rather than raw processing power alone — as the main constraint on large inference systems today.

Notably, Anthropic has said it plans to run Claude models on Maia hardware, a detail that signals Microsoft is positioning the chip not just for its own internal workloads but as infrastructure other AI labs can use through Azure.

What comes next for Microsoft’s AI chips

The real test for Maia 300 will come once production ramps in 2027 and independent benchmarks can verify Microsoft’s internal performance claims against real workloads, rather than the company’s own marketing figures. Enterprise customers evaluating Azure AI infrastructure will be watching pricing and availability details that Microsoft has not yet disclosed, along with how quickly the chip reaches the “multi-gigawatt” scale the company has promised.

The broader AI hardware market will also be watching whether Maia 300’s efficiency claims hold up well enough to meaningfully dent Nvidia’s dominance in data-centre AI chips, or whether, as with Maia 200 before it, the chip mainly serves Microsoft’s own internal demand rather than reshaping the wider competitive landscape.

Maia 300 questions, answered

When does the Maia 300 enter production?
Microsoft says production rollout begins in 2027, when the chip becomes its primary inference hardware at multi-gigawatt scale.

How much faster is it than Maia 200?
Microsoft claims up to seven times the token throughput per rack in matched 96-accelerator configurations.

Who manufactures the chip?
TSMC produces the compute chiplets using its N2P process node.

What is HBM4 and why does it matter?
HBM4 is a high-bandwidth memory standard; the eight stacks on Maia 300 deliver 18 terabytes per second, addressing memory bandwidth as the main bottleneck in large AI inference workloads.

Will other AI companies use Maia 300?
Microsoft says Anthropic plans to run Claude models on Maia hardware, suggesting the chip will serve external Azure customers as well as internal workloads.

Does this replace Maia 200 immediately?
No. Maia 200 remains in production and continues rolling out through 2026, with Maia 300 arriving as the next generation starting in 2027.

Sources

  • Techzine Global — Microsoft unveils Maia 300, designed for multi-gigawatt deployments. techzine.eu
  • Techmeme — Microsoft says Maia 300 racks will hold 96 chips and use ~167 kW of power. techmeme.com

For related coverage, see our reports on the DRAM memory chip shortage and Finland’s halt on a Google data centre.

13 Oct 2026
Hardware cryptocurrency wallet device central to the Ledger hardware wallet implant case

Someone Hid a Chip Inside a Ledger Wallet — Now $86 Million Is Missing

Categories Business

Ledger has confirmed that a Ledger hardware wallet implant — an unauthorized component secretly added to a device — was found inside a unit belonging to one user caught up in losses now estimated above $86 million. The device was purchased through CryptoBilis, a Ledger reseller operating across Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, which has suspended sales of its hardware-wallet inventory while the investigation continues.

On-chain investigator Bitquery separately estimated losses closer to $92.9 million spread across 311 wallets on five different blockchains, though that figure comes from a third party and has not been confirmed by Ledger itself. The company stressed that one confirmed implant does not establish that tampering caused every reported loss, and that the full scope of the incident remains under investigation.

How the suspected implant surfaced

Reports of unusual losses tied to CryptoBilis-sourced devices first surfaced around October 9. The story escalated the next day, October 10, when former Mt. Gox chief executive Mark Karpelès posted images of a suspicious chip he said was concealed beneath the screen of a Ledger device he had purchased in Malaysia. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao issued his own warning to Ledger users that same day, amplifying concern before Ledger itself issued a formal update.

Ledger’s October 10 statement confirmed the implant in one affected user’s device, but the company said it has found no indication that its own internal security infrastructure, systems or services were compromised. It has not confirmed whether its broader device supply chain was affected beyond the CryptoBilis channel, and it said it is working with authorities alongside the security-response group SEAL 911, which it thanked for assistance.

Circuit board close-up illustrating the hidden chip in the Ledger hardware wallet implant case

What the Ledger hardware wallet implant actually is

A hardware implant, in this context, is a small, concealed electronic component added to a device after manufacturing — physical tampering rather than a software hack. Because it sits inside the hardware itself, it can potentially intercept information a legitimate software update would never touch, which is why Ledger’s advice to affected users focuses on replacing the device entirely rather than simply updating firmware.

Ledger says it is developing additional anti-tampering measures in response, though it has not detailed what those measures will involve or when they will ship.

What Ledger is telling affected customers to do

Ledger’s guidance splits into two groups. Customers who bought a device through CryptoBilis in the 90 days before the warning and have not yet set it up are told not to begin setup at all. Those who already completed setup on such a device are advised to move their crypto holdings to a new Ledger signer using a freshly generated recovery seed, following the company’s official migration instructions rather than any third-party tool.

Ledger has also repeated a standing warning that it will never ask for a user’s 24-word recovery phrase under any circumstance, and that anyone offering “emergency help,” investigation services or fund recovery in exchange for that phrase is attempting a scam layered on top of the original incident.

What Ledger users should do next

Anyone who bought a hardware wallet through CryptoBilis in the past three months should treat the device as potentially compromised regardless of whether they have noticed anything unusual, given that a hardware implant can sit dormant and undetected. Ledger’s official support channels remain the only safe route for assistance — not search-result links, social media replies offering help, or unsolicited messages referencing the case.

Beyond this specific incident, the case is likely to renew scrutiny of hardware-wallet reseller networks generally, since the core vulnerability here was a tampered supply chain rather than a flaw in Ledger’s own design. Other hardware wallet makers selling through third-party resellers in Southeast Asia may face similar questions in the coming weeks.

Ledger implant: what you need to know

How much money has been lost?
Reports cite more than $86 million in losses, with on-chain investigator Bitquery estimating closer to $92.9 million across 311 wallets — figures Ledger has not independently confirmed in full.

Which reseller is involved?
CryptoBilis, which sells Ledger devices in Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines and has paused sales of its hardware-wallet stock.

Was Ledger’s own system hacked?
Ledger says it has no indication its internal infrastructure or services were compromised; the issue traces to physical tampering of devices sold through one reseller.

What should I do if I bought through CryptoBilis?
If you haven’t set up the device, don’t start now. If you already set it up, move your funds to a new Ledger device with a freshly generated recovery seed.

Will Ledger ever ask for my recovery phrase?
No. Ledger says it will never ask for your 24-word phrase, and anyone who does is attempting a scam.

Is the investigation finished?
No. Ledger describes the probe as ongoing and has not yet confirmed the full scope of affected devices.

Sources

  • The Crypto Times — Ledger Confirms Hardware Implant Amid $86M Loss Probe, Urges Users to Re-Seed. cryptotimes.io
  • KuCoin News — Ledger Confirms Unauthorized Hardware Implants in Wallets, Involving $92M in Reported Losses. kucoin.com

For related coverage, see our reports on the NoOnes shutdown and frozen user funds and the Revolut data breach.

1 … 15 16 17 18 19 … 228